当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Australasian Journal of Philosophy
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Benefits are Better than Harms: A Reply to Feit
Australasian Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-01-22 , DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2022.2154814 Erik Carlson 1 , Jens Johansson 1 , Olle Risberg 1
Australasian Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-01-22 , DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2022.2154814 Erik Carlson 1 , Jens Johansson 1 , Olle Risberg 1
Affiliation
We have argued that the counterfactual comparative account of harm and benefit (CCA) violates the plausible adequacy condition that an act that would harm an agent cannot leave her much better off ...
中文翻译:
利大于弊:对Feit的回复
我们认为,反事实的危害与收益比较解释(CCA)违反了合理的充分性条件,即伤害代理人的行为不会让她的处境变得更好......
更新日期:2023-01-22
中文翻译:
利大于弊:对Feit的回复
我们认为,反事实的危害与收益比较解释(CCA)违反了合理的充分性条件,即伤害代理人的行为不会让她的处境变得更好......