Value pluralists believe in multiple dimensions of value. What does betterness along a dimension have to do with being better overall? Any systematic answer begins with the Strong Pareto principle: one thing is overall better than another if it is better along one dimension and at least as good along all others. We defend Strong Pareto from recent counterexamples and use our discussion to develop a novel view of dimensions of value, one which puts Strong Pareto on firmer footing. We conclude by defending Dimensionalism, the hypothesis that overall value relations are determined solely by how things compare along value dimensions. These are first steps towards a more systematic value pluralism.

中文翻译：

---

价值维度

价值多元主义者相信价值的多个维度。一个维度上的更好与整体上更好有什么关系？任何系统的答案都始于强帕累托原则：如果一件事在一个维度上更好，并且至少在所有其他维度上都一样好，那么它就总体上比另一件事更好。我们从最近的反例中捍卫强帕累托，并利用我们的讨论发展了一种新的价值维度观点，该观点使强帕累托站稳脚跟。我们通过捍卫维度论得出结论，该假设认为整体价值关系完全取决于事物在价值维度上的比较方式。这些是迈向更系统的价值多元主义的第一步。