当前位置: X-MOL 学术BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Pelvic floor dysfunction after intervention, compared with expectant management, in prolonged second stage of labour: A population‐based questionnaire and cohort study
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology ( IF 5.8 ) Pub Date : 2024-02-20 , DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17792
Sandra Bergendahl 1, 2 , Anna Sandström 3, 4 , Hongwei Zhao 5 , Jonathan M. Snowden 6, 7 , Sophia Brismar Wendel 1, 8
Affiliation  

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of vacuum extraction (VE) or caesarean section (CS), compared with expectant management, on pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) 1–2 years postpartum in primiparous women with a prolonged second stage of labour.DesignA population‐based questionnaire and cohort study.SettingStockholm, Sweden.PopulationA cohort of 1302 primiparous women with a second stage duration of ≥3 h, delivering from December 2017 to November 2018.MethodsThe 1‐year follow‐up questionnaire from the Swedish National Perineal Laceration Register was distributed 12–24 months postpartum. Exposure was VE or CS at 3–4 h or 4–5 h, compared with expectant management.Main outcome measuresPelvic floor dysfunction was defined as at least weekly symptoms of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse or a Wexner score of ≥4. The risk of PFD was calculated using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation, presented as crude and adjusted relative risks (RRs and aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The implication of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) on pelvic floor disorders was investigated through mediation analysis.ResultsIn total, 35.1% of women reported PFD. Compared with expectant management, the risk of PFD was increased after VE at 3–4 h (aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.06–1.65) and 4–5 h (aRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05–1.70), but remained unchanged after CS. The increased risk after VE was not mediated by OASI.ConclusionsPelvic floor dysfunction was common in primiparous women after a prolonged second stage, and the risk of PFD increased after VE but was unaffected by CS, compared with expectant management. If a spontaneous vaginal delivery eventually occurred, allowing an extended duration of labour did not increase the risk of PFD.

中文翻译:

与期待治疗相比,第二产程延长时干预后盆底功能障碍:基于人群的问卷调查和队列研究

目的 探讨与期待治疗相比,负压吸引术(VE)或剖腹产术(CS)对第二产程延长的初产妇产后 1-2 年盆底功能障碍(PFD)的影响。设计基于人群的调查问卷和队列研究。地点瑞典斯德哥尔摩。人群由 1302 名第二产程持续时间≥3 小时的初产妇组成的队列,分娩时间为 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 11 月。方法瑞典国家会阴撕裂登记处发放了 1 年随访调查问卷12 –产后 24 个月。与期待治疗相比,暴露在 3-4 小时或 4-5 小时时为 VE 或 CS。主要结局指标盆底功能障碍定义为至少每周出现尿失禁、盆腔器官脱垂或 Wexner 评分≥4 的症状。PFD 的风险是使用泊松回归和稳健方差估计来计算的,以粗略和调整后的相对风险(RR 和 aRR)的形式表示,置信区间为 95%(95% CI)。通过中介分析调查产科肛门括约肌损伤 (OASI) 对盆底疾病的影响。结果总共有 35.1% 的女性报告有 PFD。与期待治疗相比,VE 后 3-4 小时(aRR 1.33,95% CI 1.06-1.65)和 4-5 小时(aRR 1.34,95% CI 1.05-1.70)PFD 风险增加,但术后保持不变。 CS。VE后风险增加并非由OASI介导。结论与期待治疗相比,盆底功能障碍在第二产程延长后的初产妇中很常见,VE后PFD风险增加,但不受CS影响。如果最终发生自然阴道分娩,延长产程不会增加 PFD 的风险。
更新日期:2024-02-20
down
wechat
bug