Well‐being is rarely considered in studies of residential segregation. This paper explores the spatial distribution of well‐being and its relationship to various forms of residential segregation. External well‐being indices are obtained for Swedish individuals through register data. The mean well‐being of 13 scales of bespoke neighbourhoods is classified into 12 clusters. Similar to previous findings, a strongly polarised pattern of neighbourhood well‐being is found. Neighbourhood well‐being is found to strongly correlate with more traditional measures of segregation. Areas in cities found in more traditional segregation studies have lower well‐being. Half of the working population lives in areas that have homogenised levels of well‐being; 14% live in a well‐being‐deprived neighbourhood. Low‐scoring areas are deprived in most well‐being dimensions, while middle and high‐scoring neighbourhoods vary in the domains they excel in. The paper is one of the first to connect segregation studies to explore the causes of the spatial sorting of well‐being. Moreover, it is one of the few that explores well‐being on scales below the regional level.

中文翻译：

---

瑞典的隔离与福祉：福祉与福祉的地理分布

在居住隔离的研究中很少考虑福祉。本文探讨了幸福感的空间分布及其与各种形式的居住隔离的关系。瑞典个人的外部幸福指数是通过登记数据获得的。13 个级别的定制社区的平均幸福感分为 12 个集群。与之前的发现类似，我们发现了社区福祉的强烈两极分化模式。研究发现，社区福祉与更传统的隔离措施密切相关。在更传统的隔离研究中发现，城市中的地区幸福感较低。一半的工作人口生活在福祉水平均质化的地区；14% 的人居住在福利匮乏的社区。低分区域在大多数幸福感维度上都被剥夺了，而中分和高分社区在其擅长的领域有所不同。这篇论文是第一篇将隔离研究联系起来以探索幸福感空间排序原因的论文之一。存在。此外，它是少数几个在区域层面以下探索福祉的国家之一。