当前位置: X-MOL 学术Eur. Respir. J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reply to: Insights on the ERS/ESTS statement on the management of pleural infection in adults
European Respiratory Journal ( IF 24.3 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-14 , DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00244-2024
Eihab O. Bedawi , Najib M. Rahman

Extract

We thank Y. Li and co-workers for their interest in the European Respiratory Society/European Society of Thoracic Surgeons statement on the management of pleural infection, recently published in the European Respiratory Journal [1]. Our interpretation of their correspondence is that they have misunderstood "IPC" to denote a standard chest drain or tube used, with a well-established evidence base, in the acute management of pleural infection [2]. This is also sometimes referred to as an intercostal catheter or an intercostal drain. In the statement, IPC refers specifically to "indwelling pleural catheter", and the abbreviation is introduced on first mention in the relevant paragraph [1]. The preceding sections discussing acute management refer to "chest tube drainage". We apologise if this was not clear.



中文翻译:

回复:对成人胸膜感染管理的 ERS/ESTS 声明的见解

提炼

我们感谢 Y. Li 及其同事对欧洲呼吸学会/欧洲胸外科医师学会关于胸膜感染管理的声明的兴趣,该声明最近发表在《欧洲呼吸杂志》上[1]。我们对他们的对应关系的解释是,他们误解了“IPC”来表示在胸膜感染的急性治疗中使用的标准胸腔引流管或导管,具有完善的证据基础[2]。这有时也称为肋间导管或肋间引流管。在声明中,IPC特指“留置胸膜导管”,该缩写是在相关段落中首次提及时引入的[1]。前面讨论急性处理的章节提到了“胸管引流”。如果不清楚,我们深表歉意。

更新日期:2024-03-14
down
wechat
bug