当前位置: X-MOL 学术Research on Social Work Practice › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Measurement Tools of Child Neglect from 2003 to 2023: A Systematic Review
Research on Social Work Practice ( IF 1.984 ) Pub Date : 2024-04-16 , DOI: 10.1177/10497315241244826
Shiqin Liu 1, 2 , Xinger Xia 2 , Yu Liu 2 , Huiping Zhang 1, 2
Affiliation  

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of the main child neglect measures published between 2003 and 2023. Method: Six databases were searched. The methodological quality and psychometric properties of the identified measures were appraised through the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. Results: A total of 39 measures were identified across the 66 studies that met the relevant inclusion criteria. The most commonly used measurement tool was The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (original or modified version), with the Child Neglect Questionnaire also showing great promise. Internal consistency was the most reported and robust psychometric property, with responsiveness, criterion validity, and measurement error being understudied. Conclusion: No instrument demonstrated a sufficient level of evidence across all criteria. Further research is required to validate the effectiveness of new and existing instruments. This can be achieved by employing higher-quality methods and assessing all psychometric properties.

中文翻译:

2003 年至 2023 年儿童忽视的测量工具:系统回顾

目的:本系统综述旨在确定和评估 2003 年至 2023 年间发布的主要儿童忽视措施的有效性。方法:检索了 6 个数据库。所确定措施的方法学质量和心理测量特性通过基于共识的健康测量仪器清单选择标准进行评估。结果:66 项研究中总共确定了 39 项符合相关纳入标准的措施。最常用的测量工具是儿童创伤问卷(原始或修改版),儿童忽视问卷也显示出巨大的前景。内部一致性是报告最多且稳健的心理测量属性,响应性、标准有效性和测量误差尚未得到充分研究。结论:没有任何工具能够在所有标准上提供足够的证据。需要进一步研究来验证新工具和现有工具的有效性。这可以通过采用更高质量的方法并评估所有心理测量特性来实现。
更新日期:2024-04-16
down
wechat
bug