Extract

In their correspondence, M.C. Tattersall and co-workers noted that our study reports contrasting findings to some earlier studies, including their own. They have raised several methodological points regarding our triangulation approach which leveraged two wholly different methods (traditional observational study and Mendelian randomisation) and multiple entirely different datasets [1]. We have discussed each of their concerns here.

中文翻译：

---

回复：哮喘与心血管疾病：三角测量的强度

提炼

MC Tattersall 和同事在他们的信件中指出，我们的研究报告的结果与一些早期的研究（包括他们自己的研究）形成了对比。他们对我们的三角测量方法提出了几个方法论观点，该方法利用了两种完全不同的方法（传统观察研究和孟德尔随机化）和多个完全不同的数据集[1]。我们在这里讨论了他们的每个担忧。