Skip to main content
Log in

Feasting at a World Center Shrine: Paleoethnobotanical and Micromorphological Investigations of a Woodhenge Earth Oven

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Earth ovens are a ubiquitous feature of eastern North America, used throughout many cultures and periods, leaving a highly visible signature of habitational life. This study focusses on one of the four uniquely outsized earth ovens from the center of a woodhenge at Hopewell Mound Group, the type site of the Hopewell culture. Cleaned of artifacts and fire-cracked rock, this feature required specialized analysis to shed light on its function: macrobotanical methods of seed identification and wood charcoal analysis along with phytolith and soil micromorphological analysis. These analyses create a holistic picture of the earth oven, the woodhenge, and the nature of feasting and ritual at Hopewell Mound Group, along with a snapshot of the paleoenvironment. Results show ritual use of ash wood (Fraxinus sp.), Eastern Agricultural Complex seeds seasonally timed with a summer solstice ritual, and grass leaf phytoliths deposited deeper than the surrounding natural strata. Feasting at this site seems to be focused on feeding large numbers of people, as opposed to a small set of competitive elites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abrams, E. M., Freter, A. C., & Stefanova, V. (2014). Environmental change since the woodland period in the Mid-Ohio Valley: Results from Patton Bog sediment core palynological analyses. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 39(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alden, H. A. (1995). Hardwoods of North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL–GTR–83. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 136 p.

  • Atalay, S., & Hastorf, C. A. (2006). Food, meals, and daily activities: Food habitus at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity, 71(2), 283–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, C. (1820). Description of the antiquities discovered in the state of Ohio and other western states. Transactions and Collections of the American Antiquarian Society, 1, 105–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baby, R. S., & Langlois, S. M. (1979). Seip Mound State Memorial: Nonmortuary aspects of Hopewell. In D. S. Brose & N. Greber (Eds.), Hopewell archaeology: The Chillicothe conference (pp. 16–18). Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauermeister, A. C. (2006). Archeological data recovery field investigations at site 33RO1059. Hopewell Archeology: The Newsletter of Hopewell Archeology in the Ohio River Valley 7(1).

  • Bauermeister, A. C. (2010). Feature finds from the riverbank site, 33RO1059. Hopewell Archeology: The Newsletter of Hopewell Archeology in the Ohio River Valley 7(2), accessed 17 January 2011.

  • Black, S., & Thoms, A. (2014). Hunter-gatherer earth ovens in the archaeological record: Fundamental concepts. American Antiquity, 79(2), 204–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks, J. (2013a). Large area magnetic survey at the Hopewell Mound Group Unit, Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Ross County, Ohio, Prepared for Midwest Archeological Center, National Park Service, Lincoln, Nebraska. Contract P12PX15855. OVAI Contract Report 2012–52–1. Prepared by Ohio Valley Archaeology, Inc., Columbus, Ohio.

  • Burks, J. (2013b). Magnetic Gradient Survey at the Upper Terrace of Hopewell Mound Group Unit, Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Ross County, Ohio, Prepared for Midwest Archeological Center, National Park Service, Lincoln, Nebraska. Contract P12PX15855. OVAI Contract Report 2012–52–3. Prepared by Ohio Valley Archaeology, Inc., Columbus, Ohio.

  • Burks, J., & Gagliano, D. W. (2009). Hopewell occupation at the Hopeton Earthworks: Large scale surface survey using GPS technology. In Mark J. Lynott (Ed.), Footprints - In the footprints of squier and davis: Archeological fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio (pp. 97–108). National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks, J., & Pederson, J. (2006). The place of nonmound debris at Hopewell Mound Group (33RO27), Ross County, Ohio. In D. K. Charles & J. E. Buikstra (Eds.), Recreating Hopewell: New perspectives on middle woodland in eastern North America (pp. 376–401). University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., d'Alpoim Guedes, J., Wohlgemuth, E., Tushingham, S. (2022). Bulbs and biographies, pine nuts and palimpsests: Exploring plant diversity and earth oven reuse at a late period plateau site. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

  • Carr, Christopher (2005) Tripartite ceremonial alliance among Scioto Hopewellian communities. In: Christopher Carr, and D. Troy Case (eds) Gathering Hopewell: Society, ritual and ritual interaction (pp. 258–338). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

  • Carr, Christopher (2008) Settlement and communities. In: D. Troy Case, and Christopher Carr (eds) The Scioto Hopewell and their neighbors: Bioarchaeological documentation and cultural understanding, pp. 101–150. Springer.

  • Carr, C., & Novotny, A. (2015). Arrangement of human remains and artifacts in Scioto Hopewell burials: Dramatic rituals or ritual dramas? In E. A. Hargrave, S. J. Schermer, K. Hedman, & R. M. Lillie (Eds.), Transforming the dead: Culturally modified bone in the prehistoric Midwest (pp. 79–101). The University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courty, Marie-Agnes., Goldberg, Paul, & Macphail, Richard. (1990). Soils and micromorphology in archaeology. Soil Science Vol. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crites, G. D., & Dale Terry, R. (1984). Nutritive Value of Maygrass, Phalaris caroliniana. Economic Botany, 38(1), 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancey, William S. (2009). Middle woodland and other settlement remains in the overly tract near the Hopeton Earthwork, Ross County, Ohio. In M. Lynott (Ed.), In the footprints of Squire and Davis Midwest Archeological Center Special Report. National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancey, W. S., & Pacheco, P. J. (1997). A community model of Ohio Hopewell settlement. In W. S. Dancey & P. J. Pacheco (Eds.), Ohio Hopewell community organization (pp. 3–40). Kent State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, H. R., & Delcourt, P. A. (1997). Pre-Columbian Native American use of fire on southern Appalachian landscapes. Conservation Biology, 11(4), 1010–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, P. A., Delcourt, H., Ison, C. R., Sharp, W., & Gremillion, K. J. (1998). Prehistoric human use of fire, the Eastern Agricultural Complex, and Appalachian oak-chestnut forests: Paleoecology of Cliff Palace Pond, Kentucky. American Antiquity, 63, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, H. R. (1987). The impact of prehistoric agriculture and land occupation on natural vegetation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcourt, P. A., Delcourt, H. R., Cridlebaugh, P. A., & Chapman, J. (1986). Holocene ethnobotanical and paleoecological record of human impact on vegetation in the Little Tennessee River Valley, Tennessee. Quaternary Research, 25, 330–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWald, S., Josiah, S., & Erdkamp, B. (2005). Heating with wood: Producing, harvesting, and processing firewood. University of Nebraska.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietler, Michael (1996) Feast and commensal politics in the political economy: Food power, and status in prehistoric Europe. In; Polly Wiessner and W. Schifenhovel (eds.) Food and the status quest: An interdisciplinary perspective. Berghahn Books, Providence, pp. 187–125.

  • Dietler, M., & Hayden, B. (Eds.). (2001). Feasts: Archaeological and ethnographic perspectives on food, politics, and power. Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everhart, T. D., & Ruby, B. J. (2020). Ritual economy and the organization of Scioto Hopewell craft production: Insights from the outskirts of the Mound City group. American Antiquity, 85(2), 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, C. W. (2013). Applied hydrogeology. Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzPatrick, E. A. (1984). The micromorphology of soils. Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, G., & Nesbitt, M. (2014). Laboratory analysis and identification of plant macroremains. In J. M. Marston, J. D’alpoim Guedes, & C. Warinner (Eds.), Method and theory in paleoethnobotany, (pp. 115–146). University Press of Colorado.

  • Gilmore, M. (1919). Uses of plants by the Indians of Missouri River region. Government Printing Office.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. I. (2006). Practical and theoretical geoarchaeology. Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greber, N. B. (1977). Within Ohio Hopewell: Analyses of burial patterns from several classic sites. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.

  • Greber, N. B (1996) A commentary on the contexts and contents of large to small Ohio Hopewell deposits. In A view from the core: A synthesis of Ohio Hopewell archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 150–172. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.

  • Greber, N., and Ruhl, K. C. (2000). The Hopewell site: A contemporary analysis based on the work of Charles C. Willoughby. Investigations in American archaeology. Eastern National, originally published 1989 by Westview Press, Boulder. Reprinted by Eastern National 2000.

  • Greenland, D. J. (1977). Soil damage by intensive arable cultivation: Temporary or permanent? Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 281, 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Castorena, Md. C., & Effland, W. R. (2010). Pedogenic and biogenic siliceous features. In Georges Stoops, Vera Marcelino, & Florias Mees (Eds.), Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths (pp. 471–496). Elsevier Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L. (1997). Archaeology of the soul: North American Indian belief and ritual. University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. P., & Matson, R. G. (2009). The use of multiple discriminant analysis in classifying prehistoric phytolith assemblages recovered from cooking residues. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, C. A. (2017). The social archaeology of food: Thinking about easting from prehistory to the present. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, B. (1996). Feasting in prehistoric and traditional societies. In: Polly Wiessner and W. Schifenhovel (eds.) Food and the status quest: An interdisciplinary perspective. Berghahn Books, Providence, pp. 127–146.

  • Hayden, B. (2009). The proof is in the pudding: Feasting and the origins of domestication. Current Anthropology, 50, 597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Brian, & Villeneuve, Suzanne. (2011). A Century of Feasting Studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 433–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, Brian. (2020). Communal versus Competitive Feasting: Comment on Kassabaum. American Antiquity, 85(4), 795–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyman, Marjorie, Elliot M. Abrams, and AnnCorinne Freter (2005) Late Archaic community aggregation and feasting in the Hocking Valley. In: Elliot M. Abrams and AnnCorinne Freter, (eds.) The emergence of the moundbuilders. Athens, Ohio University Press.

  • Honaine, M. F., Zucol, A. F., & Osterrieth, M. L. (2006). Phytolith Assemblages and Systematic Associations in Grassland Species of the South-Eastern Pampean Plains. Argentina. Annals of Botany, 98(6), 1155–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICPN Working, Group, Madella, M., Alexandre, A., and Ball, T. (2005) International code for phytolith nomenclature 1.0. Annals of Botany 96(2):253–260.

  • Kassabaum, M. C. (2019). A method for conceptualizing and classifying feasting: Interpreting communal consumption in the archaeological record. American Antiquity, 84(4), 610–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komp, R., Lüth, F., Ruby, B., Burks, J., Darvill, T. (2019). Between the monuments: Landscape-scale geophysical surveys at Hopewell Culture National Historical Park – Seip Earthworks. In: Brian G. Redmond, Bret J. Ruby, and Jarrod Burks (eds) Encountering Hopewell in the twenty-first century: Ohio and beyond (Volume 1: Monuments and Ceremony). University of Akron Press.

  • Komp, R., Lüth, F., Messal, S., Ruby, B., Burks, J., and Darvill, T. (2016). Between the monuments: Landscape-scale geophysical surveys at Hopewell Mound Group, Seip Earthworks, and beyond. Paper presented at the “Third Chillicothe Conference on Hopewell Archaeology: Hopewell Research in the 21st Century: Ohio and Beyond,” sponsored by the Ohio Archaeological Council, May 13–15, 2016. Chillicothe, Ohio.

  • Kuhns, M., & Schmidt, T. (1988). G88–881 heating with wood I (p. 862). Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, K. (2007). Sedentism in the middle woodland: Archaeobotanical evidence from the strait site. Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leone, Karen. (2008). Archaeobotanical analysis of the North Forty site (33Ro338) at Mound City in Ross County, Ohio. National Park Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Totemism. Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macphail, R. I., & Goldberg, P. (2018). Applied soils and micromorphology in archaeology. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLauchlan, K. (2003). Plant cultivation and forest clearance by prehistoric North Americans: Pollen evidence from Fort Ancient, Ohio, USA. The Holocene 13(4).

  • Madella, M., Alexandre, A., & Ball T. (2005). ICPN WORKING GROUP, International Code for Phytolith Nomenclature 1.0. Annals of Botany, 96(2), 253–260.

  • Meier, E. (2018). Wood! Identifying and using hundreds of woods worldwide. The Wood Database.

  • Messal, S. (2016) Filling the gap: Continued large scale geomagnetics at Hopewell Mound Group, Ross County, Ohio. Paper presented at the Society for American Archaeology, 81st Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida.

  • Mills, W. C. (1906). Baum prehistoric village. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, 15, 45–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Sidney. (1996). Tasting Food, Tasting Freedom: Excursions into Eating, Power, and the Past. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorehead, W. K. (1897). The Hopewell Group. The Antiquarian 1:113–120, 153–158, 178–184, 208–214, 236–244, 254–264, 291–295, 312–316.

  • Moorehead, W. K. (1922). The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio. Field Museum of Natural History.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nix, S. (2019). Heating properties of firewood by tree species. ThoughtCo. thoughtco.com/heating-properties-firewood-by-tree-species-1342848.

  • Nolan, K. C., & Howard, Steven P. (2010). Using Evolutionary Archaeology and Evolutionary Ecology to Explain Cultural Elaboration: The Case of Middle Ohio Valley Woodland Period Ceremonial Subsistence. North American Archaeologist, 31(2), 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, P.J. (1993). Ohio Hopewell settlement patterns : an application of the vacant center model to middle woodland period intracommunity settlement variability in the Upper Licking River Valley. PhD Dissertation, The Ohio State University.

  • Pacheco, P. J. (1996). Ohio Hopewell settlement patterns: An application of the vacant center model to middle woodland period intracommunity settlement variability in the Upper Licking River Valley. In P. J. Pacheco (Ed.), A view from the core: A synthesis of Ohio Hopewell archaeology (pp. 16–35). Ohio Archaeological Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, P. J., Burks, J. and Wymer, D. A. (2012). Preliminary report of results from the 2012 archaeological investigations at the datum H site, Hopewell Mound Group (33Ro26), Ross Co., Ohio, Report submitted to Midwest Archaeological Center and Hopewell Culture National Park to fulfill requirements of ARPA permit #2012–03. Not intended for public release. Ms. on file, Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Chillicothe.

  • Pacheco, P. J., Burks, J. and Wymer, D. A. (2020). Ohio Hopewell settlements on Brown’s Bottom. In: Bret Ruby, Brian Redmond, and Jarrod Burks, (eds.) Encountering Hopewell in the twenty-first century, Ohio and beyond, Volume 2. The University of Akron Press.

  • Paradis-Grenouillet, S.-P., Belingard, LeleuChristelle, & Allée, P. (2010). AnthracoLoJ: Un outil pour la simplification des mesures dendrométriques. Collection EDYTEM Cahiers De Geographie, 11(1), 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson Weinberger, J. (2009). Geophysical explorations in non-mound space at the Hopewell Mound Group. In: Mark J. Lynott (ed). Footprints- In the footprints of Squier and Davis: Archeological fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio. Midwest Archeological Center Special Report No. 5.. National Park Service, Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.

  • Piperno, D.R. (2006). Phytoliths: A Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists. Rowman Altamira.

  • Prufer, O. H. (1961). The Hopewell Complex of Ohio Ph.D. dissertation, Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Prufer, O. H. (1964) The Hopewell Complex of Ohio. In: Joseph Caldwell, and Robert Hall (eds). Hopewellian studies, Vol 12(2), pp. 35–83. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.

  • Prufer, O. H. (1965). The McGraw site: A study in Hopewellian dynamics. Cleveland Museum of Natural History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purtill, M. P. (2009). The Ohio Archaic: A review. In T. E. Emerson, D. T. McElrath, & A. C. Fortier (Eds.), Archaic societies: Diversity and diversity across the midcontinent (pp. 565–606). SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purtill, M. P. (2014). Open-air “Adena” paired-post ritual features in the Middle Ohio Valley: A new interpretation. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, 39(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. J., and Goldthwait, R. P. (1985). Glacial geology of Ross County, Ohio. Report of Investigations No. 127. Submitted to Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus.

  • Riordan, R. V. (2019). At the heart of Fort Ancient. In: Brian G. Redmond, Bret J. Ruby, and Jarrod Burks (eds) Encountering Hopewell in the twenty-first century: Ohio and beyond (Volume 1: Monuments and Ceremony). University of Akron Press.

  • Romain, W. F. (2014). Newly-discovered Hopewell Mound Group woodhenge found to be solstice aligned. The Ancient Earthworks Project, accessed 10 March 2017.

  • Romain, W. F. (2015). An archaeology of the sacred: Adena-Hopewell astronomy and landscape archaeology. Ancient Earthworks Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, A. M. (1999) The practical impact of science on near eastern and Aegean archaeology. In: S. a. S. G. Pike (ed). The practical impact of science on near eastern and Aegean archaeology, pp. 86–92. Weiner Laboratory Publication. Archetype Press, London.

  • Ruby, Bret J. (2019). Revealing ritual landscapes at the Hopewell Mound Group. In Brian G. Redmond, Bret J. Ruby, & Jarrod Burks (Eds.), Encountering Hopewell in the twenty-first century: Ohio and beyond (Volume 1: Monuments and Ceremony). University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, B. J., Carr, C., Charles, D. K. (2005). Community organizations in the Scioto, Mann, and Havana Hopewellian regions: A comparative perspective. In: Christopher Carr, and D. Troy Case (eds) Gathering Hopewell: Society, ritual, and ritual interaction, pp. 119–176. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

  • Ruby, B. J., and Lynott, M. J. (2009). Hopewellian centers in context: Investigations in and around the Hopeton Earthworks. In: Mark J. Lynott (ed). Footprints - In the footprints of Squier and Davis: Archaeological fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, pp. 109–124. Special Report Number 5. National Park Service, Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln.

  • Scott Cummings, Linda (1993). Pollen and Phytolith Analysis of a Single Sample from the Great Circle at Moundbuilders State Memorial, Ohio. Paleo Research Labs Technical Report 93–94. Prepared for Department of Anthropology, Bloomsburg University.

  • Seeman, M. F. (1979). The Hopewell interaction sphere: The evidence for interregional trade and structural complexity. Indiana Historical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, M. F. (1981). An archaeological survey of the Hopewell site (33Ro27) and vicinity, Ross County, Ohio. Submitted to Kent State University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology. Report submitted to the Ohio Historic Preservation Office in partial fulfillment of a Survey and Planning grant. On file, Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Chillicothe, Ohio.

  • Seeman, M.F., Nolan, K.C., & Hill, M. (2019). Copper as an essential and exotic Hopewell metal. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports.

  • Shetrone, Henry C. (1926) Explorations of the Hopewell Group of prehistoric earthworks. In Ohio archaeological and historical publications Volume XXXV: 5–227.

  • Shetrone, H. C. (1930). The mound builders: A reconstruction of the life of a prehistoric American race, through exploration and interpretation of their earth mounds, their burials and their cultural remains. D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. J., & Munns, D. N. (2006). Soils: An introduction. Prentic Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bruce D. (1985). The Role of Chenopodium as a Domesticate in Pre-Maize Garden Systems of the Eastern United States. Southeastern Archaeology, 4, 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, K. A. (2002). Feasting, Craft Specialization, and the Ritual Mode of Production in Small-Scale Societies. American Anthropologist, 104(1), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, K. A. (2008). Crafting the sacred: Ritual places and paraphernalia in small-scale societies. Research in Economic Anthropology, 27, 37–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielmann, K. A. (2009). Ohio Hopewell ritual craft production. In: Mark J. Lynott (ed). Footprints. In the footprints of Squier and Davis: Archeological fieldwork in Ross County, Ohio, pp. 179–188, Vol. Midwest Archeological Center, Special Report No. 5. United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.

  • Squier, E. G., and Davis, E. H. (1848). Ancient monuments of the Mississippi Valley. Smithsonian contributions to knowledge. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

  • Stoops, G., Van Ranst, E., & Verbeek, K. (2001). Pedology of soils within the spray zone of the Victoria Falls (Zimbabwe). CATENA, 46(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00153-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoops, G. (2003). Guidelines for analysis and description of soil and regolith thin sections. Soil Science Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoops, G., Van Ranst, E., & Verbeek, K. (2010). Interpretation of micromorphological features of soils and regoliths. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, A. V. (2008). The fire stones carry: Ethnographic records and archaeological expectations for hot-rock cookery in western North America. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 27(4), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, A. V. (2009). Rocks of ages: Propagation of hot-rock cookery in western North America. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(3), 573–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, A. V., Laurence, A. R., Short, L., & Kamiya, M. (2014). Baking geophytes and tracking microfossils: Taphonomic implications for earth-oven and paleodietary research. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22(4), 1038–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry-Ehrlich, T. L. (2013). Hopewell Culture National Historical Park: Geologic resources inventory report. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR— 2013/640. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. On file, Hopewell Culture National Historical Park, Chillicothe, Ohio.

  • USDA, NRCS (2019) The PLANTS database (http://plants.usda.gov, 23 February 2019). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401–4901 USA.

  • Vepraskas, M. J., and Wilson, M. A. (2008). Soil micromorphology: Concepts, techniques, and applications. In: A L Ulery and L R Drees (eds). Methods of soil analysis: Part 5 - Mineralogical methods, pp. 191–226. American Society of Agronomy, SSSA Book Series 5, Madison.

  • Vrydaghs, L., Devos, Y., & Peto, A. (2017). Opal phytoliths. In Cristiano Nicosia & Georges Stoops (Eds.), Archaeological soil and sediment micromorphology (pp. 155–163). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wandsnider, LuAnn. (1997). The roasted and the boiled: Food composition and heat treatment with special emphasis on pit-hearth cooking. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 16(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, S. (2010). Microarchaeology: Beyond the visible archaeological record. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R. (2019). Seed polymorphism and domestication in the lost crop Chenopodium berlandieri. Public Affairs, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wymer, D. A. (1987). The paleoethnobotanical record of Central Ohio-100 B.C. to A.D. 800: Subsistence continuity and cultural change. Dissertation, Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Download references

Funding

Funding for phytolith training provided by the Elizabeth A. Salt Award; funding for phytolith laboratory setup by the Larsen Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew W. Weiland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests. The views expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the view of the National Park Service, the Department of Interior, or the United States government. A couple of us are or were NPS employees at the time of the work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiland, A.W., Crawford, L.J., Ruby, B.J. et al. Feasting at a World Center Shrine: Paleoethnobotanical and Micromorphological Investigations of a Woodhenge Earth Oven. J Archaeol Method Theory (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-023-09620-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-023-09620-x

Keywords

Navigation