Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring STEM Career Awareness and Interest in Middle Childhood STEM Learners: Validation of the STEM Future-Career Interest Survey (STEM Future-CIS)

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

States and school districts in the USA have begun to create and implement curriculum to promote elementary students’ nascent STEM-related interests and to generate their initial knowledge of careers in those fields. Evaluating the efficacy of such interventions warrants valid and reliable tools, which are not presently available for middle childhood (ages 6–11) aged students in lower elementary school (approximately grades 2 to 4). This research study describes the creation and validation of the STEM Future-Career Interest Survey (STEM Future-CIS), a survey informed by extant inventories (i.e., Student Attitudes toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Survey and STEM Career Interest Survey) and grounded in the constructs of interest, self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and personal goals (i.e., social cognitive career theory or SCCT) to better understand the knowledge and interest in S-T-E-M fields for grades 2–4. From two rounds of student and teacher interviews and pilots punctuated by periods of expert review, 804 students (grades 2–4 in the southeastern U.S.) participated in the STEM Future-CIS. By employing exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses among four models, results affirmed SCCT constructs as a model for how middle childhood aged students conceive their interest to engage in future career considerations in 25 items and four validated factors of math/science interest, engineering interest, technology interest, and future self. Sampled students were able to report technology and engineering interests; however, they experienced difficulty in differentiating math and science subject areas and the related future career opportunities in engineering and technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Survey data can be made available upon reasonable request.

References

  • Acock, A. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 1012–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00191.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angle, J., Colston, N., French, D., Gustafson, J., O’Hara, S., & Shaw, E. (2016). Addressing the call to increase high school students’ STEM awareness through a collaborative event hosted by science and education faculty: A how-to approach. Science Educator, 25(1), 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdienusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922–948.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, C., Huang, K. T., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2017). Pressurizing the STEM pipeline: An expectancy-value theory analysis of youths’ STEM attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9685-1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (pp. 71–81). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory : An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevans, K. B., Riley, A. W., Moon, J., & Forrest, C. B. (2010). Conceptual and methodological advances in child-reported outcomes measurement. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 10(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, A., Gorsky, P., Nitzani-Hendel, R., & Shildhouse, B. (2023). STEM-oriented primary school children: participation in informal STEM programmes and career aspirations. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2177977

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Positive parenting tips: Middle childhood (6-8 years of age). Author. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/childdevelopment/positiveparenting/middle.html. Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

  • Chambers, C. T., & Johnston, C. (2002). Developmental differences in children’s use of rating scales. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Chow, S. C. F., & So, W. W. M. (2022). School-STEM professional collaboration to diversify stereotypes and increase interest in STEM careers among primary school students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3), 556–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L., Antonenko, P. P., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & MacFadden, B. (2021). Exploring the role of 3D printing and STEM integration levels in students’ STEM career interest. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1262–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colston, N., Thomas, J., Ley, M. T., Ivey, T., & Utley, J. (2017). Collaborating for early-age career awareness: A comparison of three instructional formats. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, M. G., Christman, J., Zion, G. H., & Yerrick, R. (2017). To educate engineers or to engineer educators?: Exploring access to engineering careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), 884–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21389

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wang, M.-T. (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415616201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M., & Unfried, A., & Wiebe, E. N., & Corn, J., & Townsend, L. W., & Collins, T. L. (2013), Student attitudes toward STEM: The development of upper elementary school and middle/high school student surveys. Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2%2D%2D22479

  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzallen, N. (2015). STEM education: What does mathematics have to offer? In M. Marshman (Ed.), Mathematics education in the margins. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 237–244). MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, L. Y., Navarro, R. L., & Ali, S. R. (2017). The state of SCCT research in relation to social class: Future directions. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fouad, N. A., & Santana, M. C. (2017). SCCT and underrepresented populations in STEM fields: Moving the needle. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716658324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. G. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00645.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. (2012). Middle and high school STEM-student survey. Author.

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. Allyn and Bacon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guzey, S. S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The impact of design-based STEM integration curricula on student achievement in engineering, science, and mathematics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 207–222.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, L., Hume, C., & Tazzyman, S. (2016). Five degrees of happiness: Effective smiley face Likert scales for evaluating with children. Interaction Design and Children’s 15th International Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930674.2930719

  • Harvey, C., & Smith, M. (2011). An inside view of Lexile measures: An interview with Malbert Smith III. Journal of the American Association of School Librarians, 39(4), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey, N., & Kucan, L. (2010). Introducing science concepts to middle childhood students through read-alouds: Interactions and multiple texts make the difference. The Reading Teacher, 63(8), 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.8.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, S., Marcoulides, G., & Parramore, M. (2003). Structural equation modeling: An introduction. In B. H. Pugesek, A. Tomer, & A. von Eye (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Applications in ecological and evolutionary biology (pp. 3–41). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Inda, M., Rodríguez, C., & Peña, J. V. (2013). Gender differences in applying social cognitive career theory in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. L. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., & Beddoes, K. (2010). Advancing global capacity for engineering education research: Relating research to practice, policy and industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 117–134.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. K., & Hite, R. (2023). Exploring when, why, and how students circumscribe and compromise science careers. The Career Development Quarterly, 71(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., Chesnutt, K., Ennes, M., Mulvey, K. L., & Cayton, E. (2021). Understanding science career aspirations: Factors predicting future science task value. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(7), 937–955.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., Ennes, M., Weedfall, D., Chesnutt, K., & Cayton, E. (2021). The development and validation of a measure of science capital, habitus, and future science interests. Research in Science Education, 51(6), 1549–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09916-y

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y. J., Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2019). Emerging and developing situational interest during children’s tablet-mediated biology learning activities at a nature center. Science Education, 103(4), 900–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21514

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kier, M. W. (2013). Examining the effects of a STEM career video intervention on the interests and STEM professional identities of rural, minority middle school students [Doctoral Dissertation, North Carolina State University]. NC State Libraries. https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/8555. Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

  • Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th Ed). Guilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W. (2013). Social cognitive career theory. In S. Brown & R. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Wei, H. R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Huggins-Manley, A. C., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2019). Using the S-STEM survey to evaluate a middle school robotics learning environment: Validity evidence in a different context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09773-z

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. Zdm, 51, 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malyn-Smith, J., Juliuson, J., MacGillivray, S., Lee, I., & McCurdy-Kirlis, C. (2021). K–8 STEM career competencies: Developing foundational skills for the future of work. Education Development Center, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Measuring the Impacts of STEM Outreach. (n.d.). Maximizing the impact of STEM outreach. Friday Institute for Educational Innovation https://miso.fi.ncsu.edu/. Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L., & Hecht, B. (2018). “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(4), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • National Science and Technology Council. (2018). Charting a course for success: America’s strategy for STEM education. Whitehouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. (2013). Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: One-factor versus two-factor structure. BMC Psychology, 1(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. R. (2012). Reading the graphics: What is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Reading and Writing, 25(3), 739–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9298-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021). Investing in career guidance. Author. https://www.oecd.org/education/career-readiness/collapsecontents/Investing%20in%20CG_booklet_EN.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

  • Paul, K. M., Maltese, A. V., & Svetina Valdivia, D. (2020). Development and validation of the role identity surveys in engineering (RIS-E) and STEM (RIS-STEM) for elementary students. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playton, S. C. (2021). Primary STEM Career Interest and Awareness: Adaptation and Validation of a Survey for Measuring STEM Career Interventions with Primary Students. [Embargoed doctoral dissertation]. Texas Tech University.

  • Playton, S. D. C., Hite, R., & Leach, P. K. (2021). A Case Study of a Researcher-Practitioner Partnership in Teaching STEM+C to Rural Elementary Students. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 25(2), 30–46. https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/20429

  • Reis, H. T., & Judd, C. M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C., & Livingston, R. (2009). Validity for teachers. In Measurement and assessment in education (2nd ed.). Pearson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Matlen, B. (2019). Coping with constraints: Longitudinal case studies of early elementary science instruction after professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 20(2), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09338-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegel, R. J., Chu, S. L., Chen, K., Deuermeyer, E., Christy, A. G., & Quek, F. (2019). Making in the classroom: Longitudinal evidence of increases in self-efficacy and STEM possible selves over time. Computers & Education, 142, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinke, J. (2017). Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEM professionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(716), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. A., & Strunk, K. K. (2017). Expectancy-value and children’s science achievement: Parents matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21382

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915571160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urdan, T. (2010). Statistics in plain English (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2016). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: An overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9308-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieselmann, J. R., Roehrig, G. H., & Kim, J. N. (2020). Who succeeds in STEM? Elementary girls’ attitudes and beliefs about self and STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 120(5), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yerdelen, S., Kahraman, N., & Taş, Y. (2016). Low socioeconomic status students’ STEM career interest in relation to gender, grade level, and stem attitude. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10171a

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca L. Hite.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This research was approved by Texas Tech University’s Institutional Review Board office as “IRB2019-1236 A Survey Validation Study in STEM Career Interest for Primary Learners: STEM-CIS Primary”.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dr. Meredith Kier has provided her permission/authorization to utilize her work on the STEM-CIS for the STEM Future-CIS.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 32.1 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 842 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 0.98 mb)

ESM 4

(PDF 36.9 mb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Playton, S.C., Childers, G.M. & Hite, R.L. Measuring STEM Career Awareness and Interest in Middle Childhood STEM Learners: Validation of the STEM Future-Career Interest Survey (STEM Future-CIS). Res Sci Educ 54, 167–184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10131-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10131-8

Keywords

Navigation