Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has laid bare a tension around scientific expertise that has major implications for the effectiveness of health systems. Critical engagement with this tension, however, is largely missing from the lessons and programs consolidating in the wake of the emergency. Lacking good frameworks for discussing the tension, the vague term “public trust” has proliferated into a buzzword that stands in for more articulate discussion. The tension between experts and the public is not new, however. It is useful to look back to the 1930s, when health experts identifying as “new epidemiologists” imagined a new modern science of epidemiology that, some believed, would resolve evident failures in public cooperation. Historical analysis of different approaches to the production and use of epidemiological knowledge in these years reveals a debate about power at the heart of epidemiology, and a critical framework for discussing the tension around epidemiological expertise in public health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All references and materials cited are available through archives and publications accessible to the public.
References
World Health Organization. Statement on the 15th Meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic. 5 May 2023. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic.
Denean A. The COVID-19 Public Health Emergency is over. Now what? The National Desk. 2023:11.
Brandt AM, Gardner M. Antagonism and accommodation. AJPH. 2000;90(5):707–15.
Fineberg HV. Public health and medicine: where the twain shall meet. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(4S3):S149–51.
Yu Z, Yi F, Zhi XZ. Healing the schism between public health and medicine, promoting the integration of prevention and treatment. Chin J Prev Med. 6 May 2020;54(5):465–8.
Yang W, Leng Z, Shan G, Wang C. Population medicine: an emerging discipline bridging the gap between preventive medicine and clinical medicine. Natl Med J China. 2020;100(26):2001–5.
Scutchfield et al. Continued counseling for the relationship between state-level medicine and public health. Am J Prev Med. March 2021;60(3):e131–8.
White K. Healing the schism: epidemiology, medicine, and the public’s health. Springer-Verlag; 1991.
World Health Organization. Call to Action, Preparedness and Resilience for Emerging Threats (PRET): Global meeting for Future Respiratory Pathogen Pandemics, 24–26 April 2023. Summary available online at: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/pret/call_to_action.pdf?sfvrsn=3e708fa5_2.
G7 Pact for Pandemic Readiness. Concept Note. 20 May 2022. Available online at: https://www.g7germany.de/resource/blob/974430/2042052/a67d7a4a73a96c388a9b7319ebef97a8/2022-05-20-pact-for-pandemic-readniness-data.pdf?download=1#:~:text=What%20are%20the%20objectives%20and,(2)%20predictable%20rapid%20response
Gates B. 3 Things We Can Do Right Now. Gates Notes, 30 April 2022. Available online at: www.gatesnotes.com/3-things-we-can-do-right-now-to-prevent-the-next-pandemic.
Powell A. Speaking from Experience on What Makes a Global Killer. Harvard Gazette, 30 March 2023. Available online at: news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/03/doctor-who-helped-vanquish-smallpox-assesses-covid-response/.
Bensaude Vincent B. The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: the case of ‘public engagement in science’. Public Underst Sci. 2014;23(3):238–53.
Epstein S, Mamo L. Toward buzzword studies: sexual health and the power of buzz. Paper Presented at ESOCITE/4SConference. BuenosAires, Argentina, 22 August 2014.
Pamuk Z. Politics and expertise: how to use science in a democratic society. Princeton University Press; 2021.
Biggs H. Preventive medicine in the city of New York. New York Health Department; 1897.
The New Epidemiology. Br Med J. 1921;1(3142):432.
Gordon JE. The epidemiology of scarlet fever: a clinical approach. JAMA. 1932;98(7):519–24.
Rosenkrantz BG. Public health and the state: changing views in Massachusetts. Harvard University Press; 1972.
Jacobson v Massachusetts, 197 US 11. (1905).
Colgrove J, Bayer R. Manifold restraints: liberty, public health, and the legacy of Jacobson v Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):571–6.
Leavitt JW. Typhoid Mary: captive to the public’s health. Beacon Press; 1996.
Harrison EA, Wu JW. Vaccine confidence in the time of COVID-19. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35(4):325–30.
Winslow CEA, Smillie WG, Doull JA, Gordon JE. The history of American epidemiology. (FH Top. ed.). The CV Mosby Company; 1952.
Gordon JE. Public health in the contexts of its social, biological, and medical origins: a brief historical review of the changing accents in public health during the past one hundred years. Eastern States Health Education Conference. 24 April 1958. NYPR Archives.
Gordon JE. Field epidemiology. Am J Med Sci. September 1963;132–154.
Gordon JE. Epidemiology, old and new. J Mich State Med Soc. 1950;49:194–9.
Gordon JE. Epidemiology in modern perspective. Proc Royal Society of Medicine 47(7): 564–70.
Greenwood M. Observational epidemiology. BMJ. 1940;Feb3:190.
Walter Bauer Papers. Box 2, Folder 23. Center for the History of Medicine. Countway Library.
Paul JR. Transcript of ASCI, Address. John Rodman Paul Papers MS 1333, Series III, Box 18, folder 4. Yale University Manuscripts and Archives; 1938.
Birn AE, Fee E. The Rockefeller Foundation and the International Health Agenda. The Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1618–9.
Paul JR. Clinical epidemiology. University of Chicago Press; 1958, 1966.
Viseltear AJ. CEA Winslow and the later years of public health at Yale, 1940–1945. Yale J Biology Med. 1987;60:447–70.
Lippmann W. The Phantom Public. Transaction Publishers; 1925.
Struthers RR. Comments on medical education in Europe. 8 January 1953. SG 3.1 and SG 3.2, Subgroup 1, Series 920, FA112, Box 1, Folder 2. Rockefeller Archive Center.
Galdston I. Public health in transition: the conference and its goals. Eastern States Health Education Conference. 24 April 1958. NYPR Archives.
Funding
Not supported by outside funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
No conflicts of interest or competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Harrison, E.A. Losing the Public, for Better or for Worse: A Lesson from John Everett Gordon (1890–1983) and John Rodman Paul (1893–1971). Eur J Epidemiol 38, 1213–1217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-023-01082-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-023-01082-5