Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Digital Gender Gap, Gender Equality and National Institutional Freedom: A Dynamic Panel Analysis

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While digital gender gap is a growing field of research in Information Systems (IS), there remains a dearth of research focusing on it. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between the digital gender gap in mobile and internet usage and gender equality. Additionally, this study also examines the impact of national institutional freedoms on the aforementioned relationship. Utilizing the theoretical framework of intersecting inequalities and building upon existing literature on the gender digital divide, this study aims to explore the associations between disparities in mobile and internet usage, gender equality, and the extent of national institutional freedoms encompassing economic, political, and media domains. In pursuit of this objective, we undertake a dynamic panel data analysis using publicly accessible archival data at the country level. The results indicate that national institutions have a significant impact on the relationship between the digital gender gap in internet and mobile phone usage and gender equality. The discussion encompasses the significance of our findings for both study and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The secondary data used in this study were obtained from publicly accessible data sources mentioned in the article and provided in Appendix B. The collated data that supports the findings of this study is available from the author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Satish Krishnan thanks the Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode’s Chair Associate Professorship for supporting this research.

Funding

No funds, grants or other support were received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satish Krishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 7 shows the summary of past research.

Table 7 Summary of past research

Appendix B

Following is a list of nations used in data analysis:

Angola, Argentina, Austria, Bahrain, Belgium, Benin, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, India, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Lebanon, Liberia, Lithuania, Malawi, Malaysia, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Namibia, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uganda, United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zimbabwe

Appendix C

figure afigure a

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, C.S., Krishnan, S. Digital Gender Gap, Gender Equality and National Institutional Freedom: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. Inf Syst Front (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10456-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10456-9

Keywords

Navigation