Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward revealing concealed risks for agile IT service management practices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid changes in the business environment have created opportunities and challenges. Businesses need to be more responsive to competitive environments and customers’ requirements. Business agility involves implementing agile practices across organizational functions. Agile processes are especially critical in IT Service Management (ITSM). When agile processes are implemented to meet changing business and customer demands in ITSM environments, the speed and leanness characterizing agile practices often lead to agile practices not always explicitly addressing all underlying risks. Customer demands for fast solutions often means that risks are not attended to with necessary thoroughness. Some risks are not apparent and these concealed risks need to be revealed and managed. The failure to completely address risks involves errors of commission and errors of omission. Coupling agile business, agile systems development, and agile ITSM practices with effective risk management approaches within the agile framework is a suggested approach to manage risk in this evolving environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen EB, Selvik JT, Engemann KJ (2020) Definition of reliability and maintenance concepts in oil and gas—validity aspects. Saf Reliab 39(2):134–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal N, Rathod U (2006) Defining ‘success’ for software projects: an exploratory revelation. Int J Proj Manag 24(4):358–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alahyari H, Gorschek T, Svensson RB (2019) An exploratory study of waste in software development organizations using agile or lean approaches: a multiple case study at 14 organizations. Inf Softw Technol 105:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkhalil Z, Hewage C, Nawaf L, Khan I (2021) Phishing attacks: a recent comprehensive study and a new anatomy. Front Comput Sci 3:563060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assmuth T, Hildén M, Benighaus C (2010) Integrated risk assessment and risk governance as socio-political phenomena: a synthetic view of the challenges. Sci Total Environ 408(18):3943–3953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.034

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine S, Payne B, Sencindiver F, Woodcock S (2005) Agile project management: steering from the edges. Commun ACM 48(12):85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamiah MA, Brohi SN (2011) Seven deadly threats and vulnerabilities in cloud computing. Int J Adv Eng Sci Technol 9(1):87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Barke H, Prechelt L (2019) Role clarity deficiencies can wreck agile teams. PeerJ Comput Sci 5:e241

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel J, Kaufmann C, Kock A (2021) Agile projects in nonagile portfolios: how project portfolio contingencies constrain agile projects’ teamwork quality. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 69:3514–3528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck K, Beedle M, Bennekum AV, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M, Grenning J et al (2001) Manifesto for agile software development. https://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 21 July 2022

  • Blankenship LV, Miles RE (1968) Organizational structure and managerial decision behavior. Adm Sci Q, 106–120

  • Boddy D, Gunson N (2021) Organizations in the network age. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm B, Turner R (2003) Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. IEEE Comput 36(6):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman H, Heikkilä J, Heikkilä M, Leopold C, Haaker T (2018) Achieving agility using business model stress testing. Electron Mark 28(2):149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosseau D, Ebrahim S, Handscomb C, Thaker S (2019) The journey to an agile organization. McKinsey & Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Buganová K, Šimíčková J (2019) Risk management in traditional and agile project management. Transport Res Procedia 40:986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetinkaya A, Ishii H, Hayakawa T (2019) An overview on denial-of-service attacks in control systems: attack models and security analyses. Entropy 21(2):210

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charitou CD, Markides CC (2003) Responses to disruptive strategic innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44(2):55-63A

    Google Scholar 

  • Crăciun AM (2018) Threats and risks to telecommunications systems. Int J Inf Secur Cybercrime (IJISC) 7(1):23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL (2020) Organization theory & design. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton DR, Todor WD, Spendolini MJ, Fielding GJ, Porter LW (1980) Organization structure and performance: a critical review. Acad Manag Rev 5(1):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Laat K (2022) Remote work and post-bureaucracy: unintended consequences of work design for gender inequality. ILR Rev 76:135–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag M, Glaister KW (2010) Factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: a comparative study of developed and emerging regions. J Manag Stud 47(8):1534–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey PK, Kinch J, Ogunlana SO (2007) Managing risk in software development projects: a case study. Ind Manag Data Syst 107(2):284–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon G, Backhouse J (2001) Current directions in IS security research: towards socio-organizational perspectives. Inf Syst J 11(2):127–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingsøyr T, Petit Y (2021) Managing layers of risk: Uncertainty in large development programs combining agile software development and traditional project management. In: Engemann KJ, O’Connor RV (eds) Project risk management: managing software development risk. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, pp 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110652321-005

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dönmez D, Grote G (2018) Two sides of the same coin—how agile software development teams approach uncertainty as threats and opportunities. Inf Softw Technol 93:94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (2017) The theory of the business (Harvard business review classics). Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbanna A, Sarker S (2015) The risks of agile software development: learning from adopters. IEEE Softw 33(5):72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ (2019) Emerging developments in organizational risk. Contin Resil Rev 1(1):26–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ (2018) The routledge companion to risk crisis and security in business. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KN, Engemann K (2022) J, Integrating dynamic modeling solutions towards a resilience model. In: Engemann KN, Engemann KJ, Scott C (eds) Organizational risk management: managing for uncertainty and ambiguity. DeGruyter, Berlin, pp 97–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KN, Engemann KJ (2017) Risk attitude chain: safety climate, risk attitude and risk decisions. Int J Bus Contin Risk Manag V7N(3):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Henderson DM (2012) Business continuity and risk management: essentials of organizational resilience. Rothstein Associates, Brookfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE (2022) Taking comfort in decisions: implications in a pandemic. Intell Decis Technol Int J 16(1):217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE (2017) Precautionary principle and attitudinal decision making. Fuzzy Econ Rev 22(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE (2015) Risk strategy and attitude sensitivity. Cybern Syst 46(3):188–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE (2009) Critical infrastructure and smart technology risk modelling using computational intelligence. Int J Bus Contin Risk Manag 1(1):91–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Yager RR (2018) Comfort decision modeling. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Sys 26(Suppl. 1):141–163

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE, Yager RR (2005) Disaster management of information resources using fuzzy and attitudinal modeling. Int J Technol Policy Manag 5(4):388–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE, Yager RR (2004) Decision making with attitudinal based expected values. Int J Technol Policy Manag 4(4):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engemann KJ, Miller HE, Yager RR (2003) Using the language of summarizing statistics in dynamic decisions. Int J Technol Policy Manag 3(3):322–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty A, Edgeworth A, Smith O, Dowling M, Yilmaz M, MacMahon ST, Clarke P (2020) Agile software development—do we really calculate the costs? A multivocal literature review. In: European conference on software process improvement. Springer, Cham, pp 203–219

  • Fournier S, Srinivasan S, Marrinan P (2021) Turning socio-political risk to your brand’s advantage. Nim Mark Intell Rev 13(2):18–25. https://doi.org/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A, Srnicek N (2021) Online platforms: economic and societal effects

  • Ghafir I, Saleem J, Hammoudeh M, Faour H, Prenosil V, Jaf S et al (2018) Security threats to critical infrastructure: the human factor. J Supercomput 74(10):4986–5002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi S, Mathiassen L (2017) Risks to effective knowledge sharing in agile software teams: a model for assessing and mitigating risks. Inf Syst J 27(6):1350–1917. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groysberg B, Lee J, Price J, Cheng J (2018) The leader’s guide to corporate culture. Harv Bus Rev 96(1):44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta M, George JF, Xia W (2019) Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: an empirical investigation. Int J Inf Manag 44:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer J (2018) The billion-dollar bank job. The New York Times Magazine, 43-L

  • Han W, Huang S (2007) An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. J Syst Softw 80(1):42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen F, Brand M, Hillegersberg J, Aydin MN (2007) Agile methods for offshore information systems development. In: First information systems workshop on global sourcing: services, knowledge and innovation, pp 1–20

  • Hassani B, Hassani BK (2016) Scenario analysis in risk management. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hazhirpasand M, Ghafari M (2021) Worrisome patterns in developers: a survey in cryptography. In: 2021 36th IEEE/ACM international conference on automated software engineering workshops (ASEW). IEEE, pp 185–190

  • Henningsson S, Kettinger WJ (2016) Understanding information systems integration deficiencies in mergers and acquisitions: a configurational perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 33(4):942–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.126751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indumini U, Vasanthapriyan S (2018) Knowledge management in agile software development—a literature review. In: 2018 National information technology conference (NITC). IEEE, pp 1–7

  • ISO/IEC (2008) ISO/IEC 12207—systems and software engineering-software - life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/IEC (2011) ISO/IEC TR 29110-5-1-2 Software engineering—lifecycle profiles for very small entities (VSEs) part 5-1-2: management and engineering guide: generic profile group: basic profile. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • ISO/IEC (2022) ISO/IEC 27005:2022 Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection—guidance on managing information security risks. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  • Ivanova IA, Pulyaeva VN, Vlasenko LV, Gibadullin AA, Sadriddinov MI (2019) Digitalization of organizations: current issues, managerial challenges and socio-economic risks. J Phys: Conf Ser 1399(3):033038

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalonen H (2011) The uncertainty of innovation: a systematic review of the literature. J Manag Res 4(1):1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Mikes A (2012) Managing risks: a new framework. Harv Bus Rev 90(6):48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan SM (2009) Smart grid. Electrical power transmission: background and policy issues. The Capital.Net, Government Series

  • Kapoor KK, Tamilmani K, Rana NP, Patil P, Dwivedi YK, Nerur S (2018) Advances in social media research: past, present and future. Inf Syst Front 20(3):531–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil C, Khalil S (2020) Exploring knowledge management in agile software development organizations. Int Entrep Manag J 16(2):555–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliem R (2004) Managing the risks of offshore IT development projects. Inf Syst Manag 21(3):22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroener I, Barnard-Wills D, Muraszkiewicz J (2021) Agile ethics: an iterative and flexible approach to assessing ethical, legal and social issues in the agile development of crisis management information systems. Ethics Inf Technol 23:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09501-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kula E, Greuter E, Van Deursen A, Georgios G (2021) Factors affecting on-time delivery in large-scale agile software development. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 48:3573–3592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal A, Erondu NA, Heymann DL, Gitahi G, Yates R (2021) Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health coverage. The Lancet 397(10268):61–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence A (2021) Annual outage analysis 2021: the causes and impacts of data center outages. Uptime Institute

  • Leffingwell D (2015) SAFe—scaled agile framework. Retrieved from http://www.scaledagileframework.com/

  • Luong TT, Sivarajah U, Weerakkody V (2021) Do agile managed information systems projects fail due to a lack of emotional intelligence? Inf Syst Front 23:415–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09962-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn R (2022) Disadvantages of agile, plainview. https://www.planview.com/resources/articles/disadvantages-agile/. Accessed 6 Apr 2022

  • Maigida AM, Abdulhamid SIM, Olalere M, Alhassan JK, Chiroma H, Dada EG (2019) Systematic literature review and metadata analysis of ransomware attacks and detection mechanisms. J Reliab Intell Environ 5(2):67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques R, Costa G, Silva M, Gonçalves P (2017) A survey of failures in the software development process. In: Proceedings of the 25th European conference on information systems (ECIS), pp 2445–2459

  • McKinsey & Company (2018) The five trademarks of agile organizations. McKinsey & Company research report. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-five-trademarks-of-agile-organizations. Accessed 6 Apr 2022

  • Miao Y, Chen C, Pan L, Han QL, Zhang J, Xiang Y (2021) Machine learning–based cyber-attacks targeting on controlled information: a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 54(7):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HE, Engemann KJ (2019a) Business continuity management in data center environments. Int J Inf Technol Syst Approach 12(1):52–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HE, Engemann KJ (2019b) The precautionary principle and unintended consequences. Kybernetes 48(2):265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HE, Engemann KJ (2015) Threats to the electric grid and the impact on organizational resilience. Int J Bus Contin Risk Manag 6(1):1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HE, Engemann KJ, Yager RR (2006) Disaster planning and management. Commun Int Inf Manag Assoc 6(2):25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Minder R (2022) Iʼm old, not an idiot—one manʼs protest gets attention of Spanish banks. New York Times, (March 25). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/25/world/europe/spanish-banks-protest-carlos-san-juan-de-laorden.html. Accessed 7 Apr 2022

  • Mintzberg H (1990) The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strateg Manag J 11(3):171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora M, Marx Gomez J, Reyes-Delgado PY, Adelakun O (2022) An integrative agile ITSM framework of tenets and practices—its design and exploratory utilization. J Org Comput Electron Commer 32:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora M, Wang F, Gómez JM, Díaz O (2019) A comparative review on the agile tenets in the IT service management and the software engineering domains. In: International conference on software process improvement. Springer, Cham, pp 102–115

  • Mora M, Marx-Gomez J, Wang F, Diaz O (2021) Agile IT service management frameworks and standards: a review. Adv Softw Eng Educ e-Learn 921–936

  • Mora M, Wang F, Phillips-Wren G, Marx Gómez J (2021b) The role of DMSS analytics tools in software project risk management. In: Engemann KJ, O’Connor RV (eds) Project risk management: managing software development risk. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, pp 49–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR (2008) Explicit risk management in agile processes. In: Abrahmasson P, Baskerville R, Conboy K, Fitzgerald B, Morgan L, Wang X (eds) Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming. Springer, Berlin, pp 190–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NIST (2012) Guide for conducting risk assessments—NIST special publication 800-30 R1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  • O’Connor RV, Duchonova N (2014) Assessing the value of an agile coach in agile method adoption. In: Barafort B, O’Connor RV, Poth A, Messnarz R (eds) Systems, software and services process improvement, vol 425. Springer, Berlin, pp 135–146

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Odzaly EE, Des Greer DS (2014) Lightweight risk management in agile projects. In: Paper presented at the 26th software engineering knowledge engineering conference, Vancouver, Canada

  • Pavlič L, Heričko M (2018) Agile coaching: the knowledge management perspective. In: Uden L, Hadzima B, Ting I-H (eds) Knowledge management in organizations, communications in computer and information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 60–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Peixoto M, Silva C, Lima R, Araújo J, Gorschek T, Silva J (2019) PCM tool: privacy requirements specification in agile software development. In: Anais Estendidos do X Congresso Brasileiro de Software: Teoria e Prática. SBC, pp 108–113

  • Rigby DK (2020) How to focus your agile teams on the right problems. https://www.bain.com/insights/designing-agile-missions/. Accessed 6 Apr 2022

  • Rigby DK, Sutherland J, Noble A (2018) Agile at scale. Harv Bus Rev 96(3):88–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez G, Soria Á, Campo M (2016) Measuring the impact of agile coaching on students’ performance. IEEE Trans Educ 59(3):202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röell C, Osabutey E, Rodgers P, Arndt F, Khane Z, Tarbag S (2022) Managing socio-political risk at the subnational level: lessons from MNE subsidiaries in Indonesia. J World Bus 57(3):2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101312,(AccessedNovember30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ropponen J, Lyytinen K (2000) Components of software development risk: How to address them? A project manager survey. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(2):98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounaghi MM (2019) Economic analysis of using green accounting and environmental accounting to identify environmental costs and sustainability indicators. Int J Ethics Syst 35:504–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Gordón M, Colomo-Palacios R (2021) Managing software development risk: Risks of introducing the role of agile coach—a multivocal literature review. In: Engemann KJ, O’Connor RV (eds) Project risk management: managing software development risk. De Gruyter Oldenbourg, Berlin, pp 25–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker S, Sarker S (2009) Exploring agility in distributed information systems development teams: an interpretive study in an offshoring context. Inf Syst Res 20(3):440–461. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz K, Mahapatra R, Nerur S (2018) User engagement in the era of hybrid agile methodology. IEEE Softw 36(4):32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh S, Abro S (2019) Comparison of traditional & agile software development methodology: a short survey. Int J Softw Eng Comput Syst 5(2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shameem M, Chandra B, Kumar RR, Kumar C (2018) A systematic literature review to identify human related challenges in globally distributed agile software development: towards a hypothetical model for scaling agile methodologies. In: 2018 4th international conference on computing communication and automation (ICCCA). IEEE, pp 1–7

  • Shrivastava SV, Rathod U (2015) Categorization of risk factors for distributed agile projects. Inf Softw Technol 58:373–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev 69(4):493–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinski A, Petersen K (2016) Prioritizing agile benefits and limitations in relation to practice usage. Softw Qual J 24(2):447–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9253-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratman JK (2008) Facilitating offshoring with enterprise technologies: reducing operational friction in the governance and production of services. J Oper Manag 26(2):275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland J, Schwaber K (2017) The scrum guide - The definitive guide to scrum: the rules of the game. Document online at http://www.scrum.org

  • Tavares B, da Silva CES, de Souza A (2019) Practices to improve risk management in agile projects. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng 29(03):381–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwana A, Keil M (2004) The one-minute risk assessment tool. Commun ACM 47(11):73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trziszka M (2019) Agile management methods in an enterprise based on cloud computing. In: International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics. Springer, Cham, pp 122–129

  • Tuunanen T, Vartiainen T, Ebrahim M, Liang M (2015) Continuous requirements risk profiling in information systems development. In: Paper presented at the 48th international conference on system sciences, Hawaii

  • Uludag Ö, Kleehaus M, Caprano C, Matthes F (2018) Identifying and structuring challenges in large-scale agile development based on a structured literature review. In: 2018 IEEE 22nd international enterprise distributed object computing conference (EDOC), pp 191–97

  • Verlaine B (2017) Toward an agile IT service management framework. Serv Sci 9(4):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vikberg T, Vihavainen A, Luukkainen M, Kurhila J (2013) Early Start in software coaching. In: Baumeister H, Weber B (eds) Agile processes in software engineering and extreme programming. Lecture notes in business information processing. Springer, Berlin, pp 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Walczak W, Kuchta D (2013) Risks Characteristic of agile project management methodologies and responses to them. Oper Res Decis 23(4):75–95. https://doi.org/10.5277/ord130406

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Weng H, Ji S, Duan F, Li Z, Chen J, He Q, Wang T (2019) Cats: cross-platform e-commerce fraud detection. In: 2019 IEEE 35th international conference on data engineering (ICDE). IEEE, pp 1874–1885

  • Wright G, Cairns G, O’Brien FA, Goodwin P (2019) Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems: pitfalls and potential. Eur J Oper Res 278(1):3–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zanen LV (2019) Unintended consequences of innovations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen. Faculty of Economics and Business)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Iona University, New Rochelle, NY, 10801, USA

    Kurt J. Engemann

  2. Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA

    Holmes E. Miller

Authors
  1. Kurt J. Engemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holmes E. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt J. Engemann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Engemann, K.J., Miller, H.E. Toward revealing concealed risks for agile IT service management practices. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00666-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-023-00666-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation