Skip to main content
Log in

Hybridizing Psychological Theories: Weighing the Ends Against the Means

  • COMMENTARY
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this commentary, I explore the contributions of the articles in this special issue from the vantage point of a theorist, researcher, and educator invested in student learning and academic development. First, I consider how these writings differentiate on the basis of the means authors applied to achieve the special issue goal of dismantling theoretical siloes and forwarding alternative models that strengthen the construct strains that exist in the educational psychology literature. Second, I position the articles in this special issue along a motivation-nonmotivation continuum, which describes the emphasis authors placed on motivation constructs and theories. Finally, I bring my ideas about these thought-provoking articles back to my personal investment in student learning and achievement to question the viability of the new theoretical variants that the contributing scholars have proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A., the Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A. (2018). Information management versus knowledge building: Implications for learning and assessment in higher education. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, M. Toepper, H. A. Pant, C. Lautenbach, & C. Kuhn (Eds.), Assessment of learning outcomes in higher education: Cross national comparisons and perspectives (pp. 43–56). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Riconscente, M. M. (2005). A matter of proof: Why achievement ≠ learning. In J. S. Carlson & J. R. Levin (Eds.), The No Child Left Behind legislation: Educational research and federal funding (pp. 27–36). Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Reynolds, R. E. (2009). What is learning anyway? A topographical perspective considered. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903029006

  • Davis, J., & Martin, D. B. (2008). Racism, assessment, and instructional practices: Implications for mathematics teachers of African American students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 1(1), 10–34. http://education.gsu.edu/JUME

  • Dinsmore, D. L., Fryer, L. K., & Dumas, D. G. (this issue). A theoretical and metatheoretical reframing of the development of cognitive processing and learning. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

  • Elliot, A. J., & Sommet, N. (this issue). Integration in the achievement motivation literature and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Emotion in the hierarchical model of approach-avoidance achievement motivation. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in Education. Academic Press. (pp. 57–73). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50005-8

  • Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009057102306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Aldhobaiban, N., Kobeisy, A., Murayama, K., Gocłowska, M. A., Lichtenfeld, S., & Khayat, A. (2016). Linking social interdependence preferences to achievement goal adoption. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.020

  • Fryer, L. K., & Leenknecht, M. J. M. (this issue). Toward an organising theoretical model for teacher clarity, feedback and self-efficacy in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Fulmer, S. M., & Frijters, J. C. (2009). A review of self-report and alternative approaches in the measurement of student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9107-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, M., & Kaplan, A. (2018). Students’ personal connection with science: Investigating the multidimensional phenomenological structure of self-relevance. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1381581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., Rubie-Davies, C., & Flint, A. (this issue). Teacher expectations and self-determination theory: Considering convergence and divergence of theories. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Kelley, E. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R., & Fryer, L. K. (this issue). Hybridizing motivational strains: How integrative theoretical models can advance the motivational sciences. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Koenka, A. C. (2020). Academic motivation theories revisited: An interactive dialog between motivation scholars on recent contributions, underexplored issues, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S.-F., Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P. H., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Cefai, C., Negovan, V., Stanculescu, E., Yang, H., Liu, Y., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Nelson, B., & Zollneritsch, J. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: the results of an international study from 12 countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000057

  • Martin, A. J. (this issue). Integrating motivation and instruction: Towards a unified approach in educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09774-w

  • Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036

  • Martin, A. J. (2016). Using Load Reduction Instruction (LRI) to boost motivation and engagement. British Psychological Society.

  • Martin, A. J., & Evans, P. (2021). Load reduction instruction policy. In: K-A. Allen., A. Reupert., & L. Oades (Eds.). Building better schools with evidence-based policy: Adaptable policy for teachers and school leaders (pp. 26–32). Routledge.

  • Noetel, M., Parker, P. Dicke, T., Beauchamp, M. R., Ntoumanis, N., Hulteen, R. M…. Lonsdale, C. (this issue). Prediction versus explanation in educational psychology: A cross-theoretical approach to using teacher behaviour to predict student engagement in physical education. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoute, E. C., Alexander, P. A., Loyens, S. M. M., Lombardi, D., & Paas, F. (2022). College students’ perceptions of relevance, personal interest, and task value. Journal of Experimental Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2133075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., Kaplan, H., Moss, J. D., Olaussen, B.S., & Wang, C. K. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0

  • Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2015). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. Routledge.

  • Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Intervening in teachers’ expectations: A random effects meta-analytic approach to examining the effectiveness of an intervention. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 83–92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.014

  • Skinner, E. (this issue). Four guideposts toward an integrated model of academic motivation: Motivational resilience, academic identity, complex social ecologies, and development. Educational Psychology Review.

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1904). An introduction to the theory of mental and social measurements. Columbia University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia A. Alexander.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexander, P.A. Hybridizing Psychological Theories: Weighing the Ends Against the Means. Educ Psychol Rev 36, 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09856-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09856-3

Keywords

Navigation