Abstract
Understanding the macro-kinetics of coal–oxygen reactions is the theoretical foundation for combating coal spontaneous combustion, with focus on obtaining kinetic parameters. There are still open questions, including which thermal analysis kinetics processing methods (TAKPMs) output more confident kinetic parameters, and how these TAKPMs respond in terms of computational accuracy when experimental conditions change. This study evaluated these questions quantitatively, and yielded the following noteworthy findings. (1) Integral processing-based multi-scan methods were more data-friendly than differentials, which produced over 40% error due to thermal noise. (2) Combined 29 widely used most probable reaction mechanism functions (MPRMFs), like Jander, Ginstling–Brounshtein, and Zhuralev–Lesokin–Tempelman, with five popular single-scan methods, and ran 870+ calculations under six experimental conditions. Using traditional model fitting to identify MPRMFs can introduce errors of 4.08–275.49% (median 121.99%). (3) Applied spectroscopy–Málek–Popescu coupling for high-confidence MPRMFs. Its integration into single-scan methods improved computational accuracy, reducing error to the range of 1.84–76.20%. However, a median of 37.76% error indicates that some single-scan methods still failed to yield satisfactory results. (4) Notably, the accuracy of single-scan methods correlated significantly with heating rate, with various methods showing positive or negative correlations. From 5 to 15 K/min, the increase/decrease in accuracy ranged 10.63–244.25% (with median of 51.40%). These findings underline the need for a case-by-case selection of TAKPMs based on experimental conditions, ensuring more confident kinetic parameters. This study introduced a workflow, exemplified with bituminous coal, to assist researchers in selecting the optimal TAKPMs for diverse experimental scenarios.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achar, B. N. N., Brindley, G. W., & Sharp, J. H. (1966). Kinetics and mechanism of dehydroxylation processes. III. Applications and limitations of dynamic methods. Proceedings of International Clay Conference Jerusalem, 1, 67–73.
Akahirac, T., & Sunose, T. (1971). Method of determining activation deterioration constant of electrical insulating materials. Chiba Institute of Technology (Science and Technology), 16, 22–31.
Cai, J., Yang, S., Zheng, W., & Song, W. (2021). Risk assessment of oxidizability of coal after dynamic hazard and its effect on functional groups and radicals. Natural Resources Research, 30, 4533–4545.
Chen, X., Ma, T., Zhai, X., & Lei, C. (2019). Thermogravimetric and infrared spectroscopic study of bituminous coal spontaneous combustion to analyze combustion reaction kinetics. Thermochimica Acta, 676, 84–93.
Chen, Y., Mori, S., & Pan, W. (1995). Estimating the combustibility of various coals by TG-DTA. Energy & Fuels, 9, 71–74.
Coats, A. W., & Redfern, J. P. (1964). Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data. Nature, 491(201), 68–69.
Deng, J., Yang, N., Wang, C., Bai, Z., Deng, Y., Zhao, X., Duan, X., & Qu, G. (2023). Influence of microstructure characteristics of deep mine coal on oxidation heat effect. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 148, 11053–11068.
Doyle, C. D. (1961). Kinetic analysis of thermogravimetric data. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 5(15), 285–292.
Flynn, J. H., & Wall, L. A. (1966). General treatment of the thermogravimetry of polymers. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 70A, 487–523.
Friedman, H. L. (1963). Kinetics of thermal degradation of char–foaming plastics from thermogravimetry–application to a phenolic plastic. Journal of Polymer Science, 6, 183–195.
Gao, J., Chang, M., & Shen, J. (2017). Comparison of bituminous coal apparent activation energy in different heating rates and oxygen concentrations based on thermo gravimetric analysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 130, 1181–1189.
Gohar, H., Khoja, A. H., Ansari, A. A., Naqvi, S. R., Liaquat, R., Hassan, M., Hasni, K., Qazi, U. Y., & Ali, I. (2022). Investigating the characterisation, kinetic mechanism, and thermodynamic behaviour of coal–biomass blends in co–pyrolysis process. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 163, 645–658.
Hu, R. Z., Gao, S. L., Zhao, F. Q., Shi, Q. Z., Zhang, T. L., & Zhang, J. J. (2008). Thermal analysis kinetics. Science Press.
Huang, X., & Rein, G. (2014). Smouldering combustion of peat in wildfires: Inverse modelling of the drying and the thermal and oxidative decomposition kinetics. Combustion and Flame, 161, 1633–1644.
Jiang, X., Yang, S., & Zhou, B. (2023). Change characteristics of radicals in different stages of coal spontaneous combustion. Natural Resources Research, 32, 283–294.
Li, C., Zuo, J., Wei, C., Xu, X., Zhou, Z., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Fracture development at laminated floor layers under longwall face in deep coal mining. Natural Resources Research, 29, 3857–3871.
Li, Q., Xiao, Y., Wang, C., Deng, J., & Shu, C. M. (2019). Thermokinetic characteristics of coal spontaneous combustion based on thermogravimetric analysis. Fuel, 250, 235–244.
Liu, H., Li, Z., Yang, Y., Miao, G., Li, P., & Wang, G. (2024). Effect of low–temperature pre–oxidation on the self–heating of coal. Fuel, 356, 129550.
Lu, W., Guo, B., Qi, G., & Yang, W. (2019). Thermal decomposition model and its reaction kinetic parameters for coal smoldering with the use of TG tests in oxygen–depleted air. Combustion Science and Technology, 193(7), 1154–1172.
MacCallum, J. R., & Tanner, J. (1970). The kinetics of thermogravimetry. European Polymer Journal, 6, 1033–1039.
Madhusudanan, P. M., Rishnan, K., & Ninan, K. N. (1986). New approximation for the p(x) function in the evaluation of nn-isothermal kinetic data. Thermochimica Acta, 97, 189–201.
Mandal, S., Mohalik, N. K., Ray, S. K., Khan, A. M., Mishra, D., & Pandey, J. K. (2022). A comparative kinetic study between TGA & DSC techniques using model-free and model-based analyses to assess spontaneous combustion propensity of Indian coals. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 159, 1113–1126.
Naktiyok, J. (2018). Determination of the self–heating temperature of coal by means of TGA analysis. Energy & Fuels, 32(2), 2299–2305.
Ozawa, T. (1965). A new method of analyzing thermogravimetric data. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, 38, 1881–1886.
Qi, G. S. (2017). Kinetic reaction mechanism and extinguishing conditions of smoldering coal in sealed fire area of coal mine. Ph.D. thesis: China University of Mining and Technology.
Ren, S., Zhang, Y., Xiao, Y., Deng, J., Ma, T., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Detection of signal of fire source for coal spontaneous combustion applied with acoustic wave. Natural Resources Research, 32, 2243–2256.
Slyusarskiy, K. V., Larionov, K. B., Osipov, V. I., Yankovsky, S. A., Gubin, V. E., & Gromov, A. A. (2017). Non–isothermal kinetic study of bituminous coal and lignite conversion in air and in argon/air mixtures. Fuel, 191, 383–392.
Song, Z., Fan, H., Jiang, J., & Li, C. (2017a). Insight into effects of pore diffusion on smoldering kinetics of coal using a 4–step chemical reaction model. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 48, 312–319.
Song, Z., Huang, X., Luo, M., Gong, J., & Pan, X. (2017b). Experimental study on the diffusion–kinetics interaction in heterogeneous reaction of coal. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 129, 1625–1637.
Starink, M. J. (1996). A new method for the derivation of activation energies from experiments performed at constant heating rate. Thermochimica Acta, 288, 97–104.
Starink, M. J. (2003). The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: A comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochimica Acta, 404, 163–176.
Tang, Y., & Huang, W. (2022). Experimental and theoretical study of the effect of particle size on the forward propagation of smoldering coal. Fuel, 312, 122903.
Wang, H., Li, J., Fan, C., Wang, L., & Chen, X. (2022). Thermal kinetics of coal spontaneous combustion based on multiphase fully coupled fluid–mechanical porous media model. Natural Resources Research, 31, 2819–2837.
Wu, D., Schmidt, M., Huang, X., & Verplaetsen, F. (2017). Self-ignition and smouldering of coal dust accumulations in O2/N2 and O2/CO2 atmospheres. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 36, 3195–3202.
Wu, M., Li, H., Wang, L., Yang, X., Dai, C., Yang, N., Li, J., Wang, Y., & Yu, M. (2023). μCT quantitative assessment of the pore–fracture structures and permeability behaviors of long-flame coal treated by infrared rapid heating. Energy, 274, 127308.
Xi, Z., Shan, Z., Li, M., & Wang, X. (2020). Analysis of coal spontaneous combustion by thermodynamic methods. Combustion Science and Technology, 4, 1–26.
Xiao, Y., Li, D., Lv, H., & Deng, J. (2019). Research on imidazolium ionic liquid inhibiting coal oxidation thermo-kinetics parameters. Journal of China Coal Society, 44(S1), 187–194.
Xu, Y., Zuo, N., Bu, Y. C., & Wang, L. Y. (2020). Experimental study on the characteristics of oxidation kinetics and heat transfer for coal-field fires under axial compression. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 139, 597–607.
Yang, Y., & Li, J. (2022). Investigation of macro–kinetics of coal–oxygen reactions under varying oxygen concentrations: Towards the understanding of combustion characteristics in underground coal fires. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 160, 232–241.
Yurdakul, S. (2016). Determination of co-combustion properties and thermal kinetics of poultry litter/coal blends using thermogravimetry. Renewable Energy, 89, 215–223.
Zhang, Q., Wang, E., Feng, X., Wang, C., Qiu, L., & Wang, H. (2021a). Assessment of rockburst risk in deep mining: an improved comprehensive index method. Natural Resources Research, 30, 1817–1834.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Shi, X., Xia, S., & Guo, Q. (2022a). Determination and dynamic variations on correlation mechanism between key groups and thermal effect of coal spontaneous combustion. Fuel, 310, 122454.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Shi, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021b). Heat effects and kinetics of coal spontaneous combustion at various oxygen contents. Energy, 234, 121299.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Shi, X., Li, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022b). Co–spontaneous combustion of coal and gangue: Thermal behavior, kinetic characteristics and interaction mechanism. Fuel, 315, 123275.
Zhukovskiy, Y. L., Batueva, D. E., Buldysko, A. D., Gil, B., & Starshaia, V. V. (2021). Fossil energy in the framework of sustainable development: analysis of prospects and development of forecast scenarios. Energies, 14(17), 5268.
Zou, L., Yang, W., Zhao, Q., Ma, L., Ren, L., & Wang, Y. (2022). Research on self-ignition characteristics and prediction indices of pulverized low-rank coal under different oxygen concentrations. Natural Resources Research, 31, 897–911.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 52274199, 51574111), Scientific Research Foundation of State Key Lab. of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control (Grant No. 2011DA105287—MS202113), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant nos. 2021M700565, 2022T150772), and the Postdoctoral Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant no. cstc2021jcyj–bsh01).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Wang, L., Chu, T. et al. Advancing the Confidence in Parameterization for Coal Spontaneous Combustion Process: A Quantitative Study on Macro-kinetics. Nat Resour Res 33, 1309–1333 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10310-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-024-10310-y