Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the study of fetal growth restriction: time to abandon SGA

  • ESSAY
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R. Birth weight and perinatal mortality: the effect of gestational age. AJPH. 1992;82(3):378–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beune IM, Bloomfield FH, Ganzevoort W, Embleton ND, Rozance PJ, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis AG, Wynia K, Gordijn SJ. Consensus based definition of growth restriction in the newborn. J Pediatr. 2018;196:71-76.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN, Silver RM, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Damhuis SE, Ganzevoort W, Gordijn SJ. Abnormal fetal growth: small for gestational age, fetal growth restriction, large for gestational age: definitions and epidemiology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021;48(2):267–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandy GT, Infants with fetal (intrauterine) growth restriction. UpToDate. Last updated 18 August 2022, literature review complete through Feb 2023, Accessed 20 Mar 2023.

  6. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Green–top Guideline No. 31, 2nd Ed. Feb 2013.

  7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133(2):e97-e109.

  8. Baschat AA. (2016) Intrauterine growth restriction. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, Landon MB, Galan HL, Jauniaux ER, Driscoll DA, Berghella V, Grobman WA. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies E-book, Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam

  9. Demicheva E, Crispi F. Long-term follow-up of intrauterine growth restriction: cardiovascular disorders. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):143–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karapati E, Sokou R, Iliodromiti Z, Tsaousi M, Sulaj A, Tsantes AG, Petropoulou C, Pouliakis A, Tsantes AE, Boutsikou T, Iacovidou N. (2023) Assessment of Hemostatic Profile in Neonates with Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Systematic Review of Literature. In: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

  11. Benítez-Marín MJ, Marín-Clavijo J, Blanco-Elena JA, Jiménez-López J, González-Mesa E. Brain sparing effect on neurodevelopment in children with intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Children. 2021;8(9):745.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kristensen S, Salihu HM, Keith LG, Kirby RS, Fowler KB, Pass MA. SGA subtypes and mortality risk among singleton births. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83(2):99–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sacchi C, Marino C, Nosarti C, Vieno A, Visentin S, Simonelli A. Association of intrauterine growth restriction and small for gestational age status with childhood cognitive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(8):772–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Esih K, Trunk T, Osredkar D, Verdenik I, Neubauer D, Troha Gergeli A, Lučovnik M. The impact of birthweight on the development of cerebral palsy: a population-based matched case-control study. Early Hum Dev. 2022;165:105533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilcox AJ, Cortese M, McConnaughey DR, Moster D, Basso O. The limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021;36(10):985–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kamphof HD, Gordijn SJ, Ganzevoort W, Verfaille V, Offerhaus PM, Franx A, Pajkrt E, de Jonge A, Henrichs J. Associations of severe adverse perinatal outcomes among continuous birth weight percentiles on different birth weight charts: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):375–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang L, Waldhoer T. Re: the limits of small-for-gestational-age as a high-risk category. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022;37:305–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hua X, Shen M, Reddy UM, Buck Louis G, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Zhang J. Comparison of the INTERGROWTH-21st, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and WHO fetal growth standards. IJGO. 2018;143(2):156–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Villar J, Altman D, Purwar M, Noble J, Knight H, Ruyan P, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros F, Lambert A, Papageorghiou A, Carvalho M, Jaffer Y, Bertino E, Gravett M, Bhutta Z, Kennedy S. International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013;120(Suppl. 2):9–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA, Newman RB, Wapner R, D’Alton ME, Skupski D, Nageotte MP. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD fetal growth studies. AJOG. 2015;213(4):449-e1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sovio U, Smith GC. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome. AJOG. 2018;218(2):S738-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Powel JE, Chavan NR, Zantow EW, Bialko MF, Farley LG, McCormick KM, Tomlinson TM. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with “small” fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction. AJOG. 2023;229(4):e1-447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gardosi J, Hugh O. Stillbirth risk and smallness for gestational age according to Hadlock, INTERGROWTH-21st, WHO, and GROW fetal weight standards: analysis by maternal ethnicity and body mass index. AJOG. 2023;S0002–9378(23):00364–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Crawford K, Hong J, Kumar S. Mediation analysis quantifying the magnitude of stillbirth risk attributable to Small for Gestational Age infants. Ajog MFM. 2023;5(12):101187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Basso O, Wilcox AJ. Intersecting birth weight-specific mortality curves: solving the riddle. Amer J Epidemiol. 2009;169(7):787–97l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hernández-Díaz H, Schisterman EF, Hernán MA. The birth weight “paradox” uncovered? Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(11):1115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Whitcomb BW, Schisterman EF, Perkins NJ, Platt RW. Quantification of collider-stratification bias and the birthweight paradox. Paediat Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(5):394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peters TJ, Golding J, Butler NR, Fryer JG, Lawrence CJ, Chamberlain GV. Plus ca change: predictors of birthweight in two national studies. BJOG. 1983;90(11):1040–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lunde A, Melve KK, Gjessing HK, Skjærven R, Irgens LM. Genetic and environmental influences on birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age by use of population-based parent-offspring data. Amer J Epidemiol. 2007;165(7):734–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hutcheon JA, Walker M, Platt RW. Assessing the value of customized birth weight percentiles. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(4):459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hutcheon JA, Riddell CA, Himes KP. A new approach for classifying fetal growth restriction. Epidemiology. 2021;32(6):860–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Basso O, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Birth weight and mortality: causality or confounding? Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(4):303–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilcox AJ, Basso O. Inferring fetal growth restriction as rare, severe, and stable over time. Eur J Epidemiol. 2023;38(5):455–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferguson KK, Sammallahti S, Rosen E, van den Dries M, Pronk A, Spaan S, et al. Fetal growth trajectories among small for gestational age babies and child neurodevelopment. Epidemiology. 2021;32:664–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bommarito PA, Cantonwine DE, Stevens DR, Welch BM, Davalos AD, Zhao S, McElrath TF, Ferguson KK. An application of group-based trajectory modeling to define fetal growth phenotypes among small-for-gestational-age births in the lifecodes fetal growth study. AJOG. 2023;228(3):334-e1.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Crovetto F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Roma E, Dominguez C, Gratacos E, Figueras F. First-trimester screening with specific algorithms for early- and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Benton SJ, McCowan LM, Heazell AE, Grynspan D, Hutcheon JA, Senger C, Burke O, Chan Y, Harding JE, Yockell-Lelievre J, Hu Y. Placental growth factor as a marker of fetal growth restriction caused by placental dysfunction. Placenta. 2016;42:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gaccioli F, Aye ILMH, Sovio U, Charnock-Jones DS, Smith GCS. Screening for fetal growth restriction using fetal biometry combined with maternal biomarkers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S725–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Smith GCS. Developing novel tests to screen for fetal growth restriction. Trends Mol Med. 2021;27(8):743–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Korzeniewski SJ, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Kim CJ, Kim YM, Kim JS, Yoon BH, Hassan SS, Yeo L. Maternal plasma angiogenic index-1 (placental growth factor/soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) is a biomarker for the burden of placental lesions consistent with uteroplacental underperfusion: a longitudinal case-cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(5):629-e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Moran L, Piltonen T, Norman RJ. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1602–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ganzevoort W, Thilaganathan B, Baschat A, Gordijn SJ. Fetal growth and risk assessment: is there an impasse? Point Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Johansson K, Granfors M, Petersson G, Bolk J, Altman M, Cnattingius S, Liu X, Sandström A, Stephansson O. The stockholm-gotland perinatal cohort-a population-based cohort including longitudinal data throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2023;37(4):276–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kvalvik LG, Wilcox AJ, Skjærven R, Østbye T, Harmon QE. Term complications and subsequent risk of preterm birth: a registry-based study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. PubMed search on “small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction,” Accessed 29 Jul 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Drs. Quaker Harmon, Steven Korzeniewski, Janet Rich-Edwards, and Clarice Weinberg provided valuable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Funding

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Intramural Program. Canada Research Chair in Perinatal Population Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, PO Box 12233, Durham, NC, 27709, USA

    Allen J. Wilcox & Kelly Ferguson

  2. Centre for Fertility and Health, Oslo, Norway

    Allen J. Wilcox

  3. School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University - Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA

    Jonathan M. Snowden

  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

    Jonathan M. Snowden

  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

    Jennifer Hutcheon

  6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Olga Basso

  7. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, 27701, Canada

    Olga Basso

Authors
  1. Allen J. Wilcox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan M. Snowden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelly Ferguson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer Hutcheon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Olga Basso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors meet the Vancouver criteria for authorship and have approved this version of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allen J. Wilcox.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilcox, A.J., Snowden, J.M., Ferguson, K. et al. On the study of fetal growth restriction: time to abandon SGA. Eur J Epidemiol 39, 233–239 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01098-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-024-01098-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation