skip to main content
survey
Free Access
Just Accepted

Meta-learning approaches for few-shot learning: A survey of recent advances

Online AM:03 May 2024Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Despite its astounding success in learning deeper multi-dimensional data, the performance of deep learning declines on new unseen tasks mainly due to its focus on same-distribution prediction. Moreover, deep learning is notorious for poor generalization from few samples. Meta-learning is a promising approach that addresses these issues by adapting to new tasks with few-shot datasets. This survey first briefly introduces meta-learning and then investigates state-of-the-art meta-learning methods and recent advances in: (i) metric-based, (ii) memory-based, (iii), and learning-based methods. Finally, current challenges and insights for future researches are discussed.

References

  1. Mounir Abdelaziz and Zuping Zhang. 2022. Multi-scale kronecker-product relation networks for few-shot learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications 81, 5 (2022), 6703–6722.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dalal A Alajaji and Haikel Alhichri. 2020. Few shot scene classification in remote sensing using meta-agnostic machine. In 2020 6th conference on data science and machine learning applications (CDMA). IEEE, 77–80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sajid Ali, Tamer Abuhmed, Shaker El-Sappagh, Khan Muhammad, Jose M Alonso-Moral, Roberto Confalonieri, Riccardo Guidotti, Javier Del Ser, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez, and Francisco Herrera. 2023. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion 99(2023), 101805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Md Rabiul Awal, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Eshaan Tanwar, Tanmay Garg, and Tanmoy Chakraborty. 2023. Model-agnostic meta-learning for multilingual hate speech detection. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sungyong Baik, Seokil Hong, and Kyoung Mu Lee. 2020. Learning to forget for meta-learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2379–2387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pierre Baldi and Yves Chauvin. 1993. Neural networks for fingerprint recognition. neural computation 5, 3 (1993), 402–418.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Atilim Gunes Baydin, Robert Cornish, David Martinez Rubio, Mark Schmidt, and Frank Wood. 2017. Online learning rate adaptation with hypergradient descent. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04782(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Harkirat Singh Behl, Atılım Güneş Baydin, and Philip HS Torr. 2019. Alpha maml: Adaptive model-agnostic meta-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07435(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Luca Bertinetto, Joao F Henriques, Philip Torr, and Andrea Vedaldi. 2018. Meta-learning with differentiable closed-form solvers. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Luca Bertinetto, João F Henriques, Jack Valmadre, Philip Torr, and Andrea Vedaldi. 2016. Learning feed-forward one-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hemanthage S Bhathiya and Uthayasanker Thayasivam. 2020. Meta learning for few-shot joint intent detection and slot-filling. In Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Machine Learning Technologies. 86–92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jane Bromley, Isabelle Guyon, Yann LeCun, Eduard Säckinger, and Roopak Shah. 1993. Signature verification using a” siamese” time delay neural network. Advances in neural information processing systems 6 (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mengting Chen, Xinggang Wang, Heng Luo, Yifeng Geng, and Wenyu Liu. 2021. Learning to focus: cascaded feature matching network for few-shot image recognition. Science China Information Sciences 64, 9 (2021), 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Xi Chen, Ali Ghadirzadeh, Mårten Björkman, and Patric Jensfelt. 2019. Meta-learning for multi-objective reinforcement learning. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 977–983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Davide Chicco. 2021. Siamese neural networks: An overview. Artificial Neural Networks(2021), 73–94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sumit Chopra, Raia Hadsell, and Yann LeCun. 2005. Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), Vol.  1. IEEE, 539–546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jessica Deuschel, Daniel Firmbach, Carol I Geppert, Markus Eckstein, Arndt Hartmann, Volker Bruns, Petr Kuritcyn, Jakob Dexl, David Hartmann, Dominik Perrin, et al. 2021. Multi-Prototype Few-shot Learning in Histopathology. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 620–628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yueming Ding, Xia Tian, Lirong Yin, Xiaobing Chen, Shan Liu, Bo Yang, and Wenfeng Zheng. 2019. Multi-scale relation network for few-shot learning based on meta-learning. In International Conference on Computer Vision Systems. Springer, 343–352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Harrison Edwards and Amos Storkey. 2016. Towards a neural statistician. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02185(2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Abolfazl Farahani, Sahar Voghoei, Khaled Rasheed, and Hamid R Arabnia. 2021. A brief review of domain adaptation. Advances in data science and information engineering (2021), 877–894.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1126–1135.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chelsea Finn and Sergey Levine. 2018. Meta-Learning and Universality: Deep Representations and Gradient Descent can Approximate any Learning Algorithm. In International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chelsea Finn, Kelvin Xu, and Sergey Levine. 2018. Probabilistic model-agnostic meta-learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Chelsea B Finn. 2018. Learning to learn with gradients. University of California, Berkeley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stanislav Fort. 2017. Gaussian prototypical networks for few-shot learning on omniglot. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.02735(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Victor Garcia and Joan Bruna. 2017. Few-shot learning with graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04043(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Victor Garcia and Joan Bruna. 2018. Few-shot learning with graph neural networks. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Marta Garnelo, Dan Rosenbaum, Christopher Maddison, Tiago Ramalho, David Saxton, Murray Shanahan, Yee Whye Teh, Danilo Rezende, and SM Ali Eslami. 2018. Conditional neural processes. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1704–1713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Spyros Gidaris and Nikos Komodakis. 2018. Dynamic few-shot visual learning without forgetting. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 4367–4375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Spyros Gidaris and Nikos Komodakis. 2019. Generating classification weights with gnn denoising autoencoders for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 21–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Micah Goldblum, Liam Fowl, and Tom Goldstein. 2020. Adversarially robust few-shot learning: A meta-learning approach. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 17886–17895.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Erin Grant, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine, Trevor Darrell, and Thomas Griffiths. 2018. Recasting gradient-based meta-learning as hierarchical bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08930(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alex Graves, Greg Wayne, and Ivo Danihelka. 2014. Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jiatao Gu, Yong Wang, Yun Chen, Kyunghyun Cho, and Victor OK Li. 2018. Meta-learning for low-resource neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08437(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Chengcheng Han, Zeqiu Fan, Dongxiang Zhang, Minghui Qiu, Ming Gao, and Aoying Zhou. 2021. Meta-learning adversarial domain adaptation network for few-shot text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.12262(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Chengcheng Han, Yuhe Wang, Yingnan Fu, Xiang Li, Minghui Qiu, Ming Gao, and Aoying Zhou. 2023. Meta-learning Siamese Network for Few-Shot Text Classification. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. Springer, 737–752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mengya Han, Ronggui Wang, Juan Yang, Lixia Xue, and Min Hu. 2020. Multi-scale feature network for few-shot learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications 79, 17 (2020), 11617–11637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Jun He, Richang Hong, Xueliang Liu, Mingliang Xu, Zheng-Jun Zha, and Meng Wang. 2020. Memory-augmented relation network for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1236–1244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Nathan Hilliard, Lawrence Phillips, Scott Howland, Artëm Yankov, Courtney D Corley, and Nathan O Hodas. 2018. Few-shot learning with metric-agnostic conditional embeddings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04376(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Yufan Hu, Junyu Gao, and Changsheng Xu. 2020. Learning dual-pooling graph neural networks for few-shot video classification. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 23 (2020), 4285–4296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hongwei Huang, Zhangkai Wu, Wenbin Li, Jing Huo, and Yang Gao. 2021. Local descriptor-based multi-prototype network for few-shot learning. Pattern Recognition 116(2021), 107935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Kuan-Po Huang, Yuan-Kuei Wu, and Hung-yi Lee. 2021. Multi-accent speech separation with one shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11713(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mike Huisman, Jan N Van Rijn, and Aske Plaat. 2021. A survey of deep meta-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 54, 6 (2021), 4483–4541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Olga Ilina, Vadim Ziyadinov, Nikolay Klenov, and Maxim Tereshonok. 2022. A Survey on Symmetrical Neural Network Architectures and Applications. Symmetry 14, 7 (2022), 1391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Muhammad Abdullah Jamal and Guo-Jun Qi. 2019. Task agnostic meta-learning for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 11719–11727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Zhong Ji, Xingliang Chai, Yunlong Yu, Yanwei Pang, and Zhongfei Zhang. 2020. Improved prototypical networks for few-shot learning. Pattern Recognition Letters 140 (2020), 81–87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Hongyang Jiang, Mengdi Gao, Heng Li, Richu Jin, Hanpei Miao, and Jiang Liu. 2022. Multi-Learner Based Deep Meta-Learning for Few-Shot Medical Image Classification. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 27, 1(2022), 17–28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Xiang Jiang, Mohammad Havaei, Gabriel Chartrand, Hassan Chouaib, Thomas Vincent, Andrew Jesson, Nicolas Chapados, and Stan Matwin. 2018. Attentive task-agnostic meta-learning for few-shot text classification. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Ilchae Jung, Kihyun You, Hyeonwoo Noh, Minsu Cho, and Bohyung Han. 2020. Real-time object tracking via meta-learning: Efficient model adaptation and one-shot channel pruning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol.  34. 11205–11212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Rituraj Kaushik, Timothée Anne, and Jean-Baptiste Mouret. 2020. Fast online adaptation in robotics through meta-learning embeddings of simulated priors. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 5269–5276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Kian Kenyon-Dean, Andre Cianflone, Lucas Page-Caccia, Guillaume Rabusseau, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, and Doina Precup. 2018. Clustering-oriented representation learning with attractive-repulsive loss. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.07627(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Rabindra Khadka, Debesh Jha, Steven Hicks, Vajira Thambawita, Michael A Riegler, Sharib Ali, and Pål Halvorsen. 2022. Meta-learning with implicit gradients in a few-shot setting for medical image segmentation. Computers in Biology and Medicine 143 (2022), 105227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Byeonggeun Kim, Seunghan Yang, Inseop Chung, and Simyung Chang. 2022. Dummy Prototypical Networks for Few-Shot Open-Set Keyword Spotting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13691(2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Gregory Koch, Richard Zemel, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, et al. 2015. Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition. In ICML deep learning workshop, Vol.  2. Lille, 0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Steinar Laenen and Luca Bertinetto. 2021. On episodes, prototypical networks, and few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 24581–24592.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Brenden Lake, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Jason Gross, and Joshua Tenenbaum. 2011. One shot learning of simple visual concepts. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Vol.  33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Kwonjoon Lee, Subhransu Maji, Avinash Ravichandran, and Stefano Soatto. 2019. Meta-learning with differentiable convex optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 10657–10665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Aoxue Li, Tiange Luo, Tao Xiang, Weiran Huang, and Liwei Wang. 2019. Few-shot learning with global class representations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 9715–9724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Haifeng Li, Zhenqi Cui, Zhiqing Zhu, Li Chen, Jiawei Zhu, Haozhe Huang, and Chao Tao. 2020. RS-MetaNet: Deep meta metric learning for few-shot remote sensing scene classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13364(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Huaiyu Li, Weiming Dong, Xing Mei, Chongyang Ma, Feiyue Huang, and Bao-Gang Hu. 2019. LGM-Net: Learning to generate matching networks for few-shot learning. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 3825–3834.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Xiaoxu Li, Zhuo Sun, Jing-Hao Xue, and Zhanyu Ma. 2021. A concise review of recent few-shot meta-learning methods. Neurocomputing 456(2021), 463–468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Yong Li, Zhenfeng Shao, Xiao Huang, Bowen Cai, and Song Peng. 2021. Meta-FSEO: A meta-learning fast adaptation with self-supervised embedding optimization for few-shot remote sensing scene classification. Remote Sensing 13, 14 (2021), 2776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Zhenguo Li, Fengwei Zhou, Fei Chen, and Hang Li. 2017. Meta-sgd: Learning to learn quickly for few-shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09835(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Bin Liang, Xiang Li, Lin Gui, Yonghao Fu, Yulan He, Min Yang, and Ruifeng Xu. 2023. Few-shot aspect category sentiment analysis via meta-learning. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 41, 1 (2023), 1–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Bo Liu, Hao Kang, Haoxiang Li, Gang Hua, and Nuno Vasconcelos. 2020. Few-shot open-set recognition using meta-learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8798–8807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Han Liu, Feng Zhang, Xiaotong Zhang, Siyang Zhao, Junjie Sun, Hong Yu, and Xianchao Zhang. 2022. Label-enhanced Prototypical Network with Contrastive Learning for Multi-label Few-shot Aspect Category Detection. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1079–1087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Shuai Liu, Shichen Huang, Shuai Wang, Khan Muhammad, Paolo Bellavista, and Javier Del Ser. 2023. Visual tracking in complex scenes: A location fusion mechanism based on the combination of multiple visual cognition flows. Information Fusion 96(2023), 281–296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Xiaoqian Liu, Fengyu Zhou, Jin Liu, and Lianjie Jiang. 2020. Meta-learning based prototype-relation network for few-shot classification. Neurocomputing 383(2020), 224–234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Jiang Lu, Zhong Cao, Kailun Wu, Gang Zhang, and Changshui Zhang. 2018. Boosting few-shot image recognition via domain alignment prototypical networks. In 2018 IEEE 30th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE, 260–264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Jiang Lu, Pinghua Gong, Jieping Ye, and Changshui Zhang. 2020. Learning from very few samples: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02653(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Liangfu Lu, Xudong Cui, Zhiyuan Tan, and Yulei Wu. 2023. MedOptNet: Meta-Learning Framework for Few-shot Medical Image Classification. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Shuai Luo, Yujie Li, Pengxiang Gao, Yichuan Wang, and Seiichi Serikawa. 2022. Meta-seg: A survey of meta-learning for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition 126(2022), 108586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Sijie Mai, Haifeng Hu, and Jia Xu. 2019. Attentive matching network for few-shot learning. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 187 (2019), 102781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Iaroslav Melekhov, Juho Kannala, and Esa Rahtu. 2016. Siamese network features for image matching. In 2016 23rd international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR). IEEE, 378–383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Nikhil Mishra, Mostafa Rohaninejad, Xi Chen, and Pieter Abbeel. 2017. A simple neural attentive meta-learner. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.03141(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Tom M Mitchell and Tom M Mitchell. 1997. Machine learning. Vol.  1. McGraw-hill New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Marzieh Mozafari, Reza Farahbakhsh, and Noel Crespi. 2022. Cross-lingual few-shot hate speech and offensive language detection using meta learning. IEEE Access 10(2022), 14880–14896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Tsendsuren Munkhdalai and Hong Yu. 2017. Meta networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2554–2563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Alex Nichol, Joshua Achiam, and John Schulman. 2018. On first-order meta-learning algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02999(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Jaehoon Oh, Hyungjun Yoo, ChangHwan Kim, and Se-Young Yun. 2020. BOIL: Towards representation change for few-shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08882(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Frederik Pahde, Mihai Puscas, Tassilo Klein, and Moin Nabi. 2021. Multimodal prototypical networks for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. 2644–2653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 22, 10(2009), 1345–1359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Yingwei Pan, Ting Yao, Yehao Li, Yu Wang, Chong-Wah Ngo, and Tao Mei. 2019. Transferrable prototypical networks for unsupervised domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2239–2247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Sumit Pandey and Srishti Sharma. 2023. Meta-Learned Word Embeddings for Few-Shot Sentiment Classification. In International Conference on Smart Trends in Computing and Communications. Springer, 577–589.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Hang Qi, Matthew Brown, and David G Lowe. 2018. Low-shot learning with imprinted weights. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5822–5830.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Aravind Rajeswaran, Chelsea Finn, Sham M Kakade, and Sergey Levine. 2019. Meta-learning with implicit gradients. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Sachin Ravi and Hugo Larochelle. 2016. Optimization as a model for few-shot learning. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Li Ren, Guiduo Duan, Tianxi Huang, and Zhao Kang. 2022. Multi-local feature relation network for few-shot learning. Neural Computing and Applications 34, 10 (2022), 7393–7403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Mengye Ren, Renjie Liao, Ethan Fetaya, and Richard Zemel. 2019. Incremental few-shot learning with attention attractor networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Mengye Ren, Eleni Triantafillou, Sachin Ravi, Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Hugo Larochelle, and Richard S Zemel. 2018. Meta-learning for semi-supervised few-shot classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.00676(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Sebastian Ruder, Matthew E Peters, Swabha Swayamdipta, and Thomas Wolf. 2019. Transfer learning in natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Tutorials. 15–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Andrei A Rusu, Dushyant Rao, Jakub Sygnowski, Oriol Vinyals, Razvan Pascanu, Simon Osindero, and Raia Hadsell. 2018. Meta-learning with latent embedding optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.05960(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Alok Ranjan Sahoo and Pavan Chakraborty. 2022. A Study on Position Control of a Continuum Arm Using MAML (Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning) for Adapting Different Loading Conditions. IEEE Access 10(2022), 14980–14992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. Adam Santoro, Sergey Bartunov, Matthew Botvinick, Daan Wierstra, and Timothy Lillicrap. 2016. Meta-learning with memory-augmented neural networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1842–1850.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Adam Santoro, David Raposo, David G Barrett, Mateusz Malinowski, Razvan Pascanu, Peter Battaglia, and Timothy Lillicrap. 2017. A simple neural network module for relational reasoning. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Manali Shaha and Meenakshi Pawar. 2018. Transfer learning for image classification. In 2018 second international conference on electronics, communication and aerospace technology (ICECA). IEEE, 656–660.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Amr Sharaf, Hany Hassan, and Hal Daumé III. 2020. Meta-learning for few-shot NMT adaptation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02745(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Pranav Shyam, Shubham Gupta, and Ambedkar Dukkipati. 2017. Attentive recurrent comparators. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 3173–3181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Satwinder Singh, Ruili Wang, and Feng Hou. 2022. Improved meta learning for low resource speech recognition. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 4798–4802.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, and Richard Zemel. 2017. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Qianru Sun, Yaoyao Liu, Tat-Seng Chua, and Bernt Schiele. 2019. Meta-transfer learning for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 403–412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. Flood Sung, Yongxin Yang, Li Zhang, Tao Xiang, Philip HS Torr, and Timothy M Hospedales. 2018. Learning to compare: Relation network for few-shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1199–1208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  104. Xu Tang, Weiquan Lin, Chao Liu, Xiao Han, Wenjing Wang, Jingjing Ma, and Licheng Jiao. 2021. Multi-Scale Meta-Learning-Based Networks for High-Resolution Remote Sensing Scene Classification. In 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. IEEE, 4928–4931.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Sebastian Thrun and Lorien Pratt. 2012. Learning to learn. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Kien Tran, Hiroshi Sato, and Masao Kubo. 2019. Memory augmented matching networks for few-shot learnings. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing 9, 6 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  107. Eleni Triantafillou, Tyler Zhu, Vincent Dumoulin, Pascal Lamblin, Utku Evci, Kelvin Xu, Ross Goroshin, Carles Gelada, Kevin Swersky, Pierre-Antoine Manzagol, et al. 2019. Meta-dataset: A dataset of datasets for learning to learn from few examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03096(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Timothy Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. 2016. Matching networks for one shot learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Catherine Wah, Steve Branson, Peter Welinder, Pietro Perona, and Serge Belongie. 2011. The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Dequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno Olshausen, and Trevor Darrell. 2020. Tent: Fully test-time adaptation by entropy minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10726(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Guangting Wang, Chong Luo, Xiaoyan Sun, Zhiwei Xiong, and Wenjun Zeng. 2020. Tracking by instance detection: A meta-learning approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 6288–6297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  112. Jindong Wang, Cuiling Lan, Chang Liu, Yidong Ouyang, Tao Qin, Wang Lu, Yiqiang Chen, Wenjun Zeng, and Philip Yu. 2022. Generalizing to unseen domains: A survey on domain generalization. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Jane X Wang. 2021. Meta-learning in natural and artificial intelligence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 38 (2021), 90–95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  114. Mei Wang and Weihong Deng. 2018. Deep visual domain adaptation: A survey. Neurocomputing 312(2018), 135–153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Xin Wang, Fisher Yu, Ruth Wang, Trevor Darrell, and Joseph E Gonzalez. 2019. Tafe-net: Task-aware feature embeddings for low shot learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1831–1840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Yu-Xiong Wang, Deva Ramanan, and Martial Hebert. 2019. Meta-learning to detect rare objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 9925–9934.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. Xiu-Shen Wei, Jian-Hao Luo, Jianxin Wu, and Zhi-Hua Zhou. 2017. Selective convolutional descriptor aggregation for fine-grained image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 26, 6 (2017), 2868–2881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  118. Xiongwei Wu, Doyen Sahoo, and Steven Hoi. 2020. Meta-rcnn: Meta learning for few-shot object detection. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1679–1687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. Zhiyu Xue, Lixin Duan, Wen Li, Lin Chen, and Jiebo Luo. 2020. Region comparison network for interpretable few-shot image classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03558(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhiyu Xue, Zhenshan Xie, Zheng Xing, and Lixin Duan. 2020. Relative position and map networks in few-shot learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 932–933.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  121. Chengxiang Yin, Jian Tang, Zhiyuan Xu, and Yanzhi Wang. 2018. Adversarial meta-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03316(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. Jaesik Yoon, Taesup Kim, Ousmane Dia, Sungwoong Kim, Yoshua Bengio, and Sungjin Ahn. 2018. Bayesian model-agnostic meta-learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. Jason Yosinski, Jeff Clune, Yoshua Bengio, and Hod Lipson. 2014. How transferable are features in deep neural networks?Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. Kenny Young, Baoxiang Wang, and Matthew E Taylor. 2018. Metatrace actor-critic: Online step-size tuning by meta-gradient descent for reinforcement learning control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04514(2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Zhou Yu, Jun Yu, Chenchao Xiang, Jianping Fan, and Dacheng Tao. 2018. Beyond bilinear: Generalized multimodal factorized high-order pooling for visual question answering. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 29, 12(2018), 5947–5959.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. Lingling Zhang, Jun Liu, Minnan Luo, Xiaojun Chang, Qinghua Zheng, and Alexander G Hauptmann. 2019. Scheduled sampling for one-shot learning via matching network. Pattern Recognition 96(2019), 106962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  127. Pei Zhang, Yunpeng Bai, Dong Wang, Bendu Bai, and Ying Li. 2020. Few-shot classification of aerial scene images via meta-learning. Remote Sensing 13, 1 (2020), 108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  128. Pei Zhang, Yunpeng Bai, Dong Wang, Bendu Bai, and Ying Li. 2021. A meta-learning framework for few-shot classification of remote sensing scene. In ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 4590–4594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  129. Yaohui Zhu, Chenlong Liu, and Shuqiang Jiang. 2020. Multi-attention Meta Learning for Few-shot Fine-grained Image Recognition.. In IJCAI. 1090–1096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Zhenxi Zhu, Limin Wang, Sheng Guo, and Gangshan Wu. 2021. A closer look at few-shot video classification: A new baseline and benchmark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.12358(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. Luisa M Zintgraf, Kyriacos Shiarlis, Vitaly Kurin, Katja Hofmann, and Shimon Whiteson. 2018. Caml: Fast context adaptation via meta-learning. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Meta-learning approaches for few-shot learning: A survey of recent advances

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Computing Surveys
          ACM Computing Surveys Just Accepted
          ISSN:0360-0300
          EISSN:1557-7341
          Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Online AM: 3 May 2024
          • Accepted: 2 April 2024
          • Revised: 12 December 2023
          • Received: 27 January 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • survey
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)270
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)270

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader